Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 25;50(6):401–406. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2020.50.6.401

Table 3.

Differences in the slot top to slot base measurements and parallelism of the slot walls

Bracket series Slot top Slot base Difference from
slot top to slot base
p-value Tukey test
MIM
Di MIM 0.02504 ± 0.00111 0.02353 ± 0.00088 0.00151 ± 0.00014 0.000*** E
Mini Diamond 0.02337 ± 0.00071 0.02235 ± 0.00051 0.00102 ± 0.00009 0.000*** D
Gemini 0.02313 ± 0.00040 0.02266 ± 0.00038 0.00048 ± 0.00006 0.000*** C
Formula R 0.02316 ± 0.00059 0.02284 ± 0.00048 0.00032 ± 0.00008 0.000*** B
CNC
Econoline 0.02347 ± 0.00068 0.02289 ± 0.00053 0.00059 ± 0.00009 0.000*** C
Legend 0.02309 ± 0.00044 0.02283 ± 0.00051 0.00027 ± 0.00007 0.000*** B
Crown 0.02335 ± 0.00088 0.02263 ± 0.00075 0.00071 ± 0.00012 0.000*** C
Evolve 0.02257 ± 0.00085 0.02259 ± 0.00099 0.00002 ± 0.00001 0.902 A

Data are represented as mean ± standard deviation.

All the data were measured in inches.

Independent t-tests were performed between the slot top and slot base because of the normality of the data.

Slot parallelism could be interpreted from the p-values.

One-way ANOVA was performed due to the normality of the data (p = 0.000, <0.05).

The results showed statistical differences between the groups (p < 0.05).

Tukey’s post-hoc test was performed; subgroups for α = 0.05.

The different characters represent the statistical differences.

***p < 0.001.