Table 1.

Comparison of Parameters and Scores for Models A and B at the Start and After Refinement

Model	A		B
	Start	After	Start	After
kaAM′ (s−1)	266	323	266	254
kdAM (s−1)	0.857	2.37	0.857	0.996
kkyd (s−1)	100	127	100	129
k−hyd (s−1)	10	12.7	10	12.9
Ktens1AM	234	221	234	48.4
Ktens2AM	173	176	173	37.8
ktens1AM (s−1)	2060	3210	2060	1398
ktens2AM (s−1)	7670	13,080	7670	2340
kiAM (s−1)	332	570	332	265
ΔD (nm)	0.698	0.561	0.698	1.22
κ (pΝ/nm)	1.7	1.7	1.7	1.71
l1 (nm)	5.6	5.9	5.6	6.75
l2 (nm)	4.55	4.47	4.55	4.98
d (nm)	2.16	2.76	2.16	2.3
f1	0.402	0.531	0.402	0.4
f2	0.851	0.555	0.851	0.581
c	0.546	0.482	0.546	0.458
kp (s−1)	70	493	70	6620
Kp (mM)	10	1.33	10	3.14
d1	0.01	0.0005	0.01	0.0026
d2	–	–	0.01	0.000069
P0 (pN/Head)	2.47	2.03	2.66	1.91
Isometric occupancy attached	0.546	0.482	0.546	0.458
Isometric ATPase (s−1)	0.189	0.477	0.236	0.012
% efficiency	30.2	31.7	34.9	40.7
P0 score	0.546	0.271	0.662	0.193
Efficiency score	0.123	0.104	0.064	0.009
pv score	14.13	1.014	13.38	1.312
κ score	0	0	0	0
T1 score	0.852	0.342	1.709	0.26
Transient score	4.962	1.965	12.52	1.873
Pi score	1.285	0.048	1.04	0.592
Total score	21.9	3.74	29.4	4.24