Table 4.
Evaluation of the concordance between diagnosis by laboratory and the algorithm created with respect to the ratio of PANBIO Units of IgG.
| Lab test | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline (first follow-up) | Second follow-up | Samples with IgG2/IgG1 > 1 | Mediana (units PANBIO) | Range (units PANBIO) | Diagnostic infection by seroconversion | % of agreementa | |||
| IgM | IgG | IgM | IgG | IgG2/IgG1 | |||||
| Negative | Negative | Positive | Negative | N.A.b | N.A.b | N.A.b | N.A.b | 12 | N.A.b |
| Negative | Negative | Positive | Positive | 5 | 22.08 | 9.24 | 37.22 | 5 | 100 |
| Negative | Negative | Negative | Positive | 20 | 7.30 | 1.04 | 57.28 | 20 | 100 |
aThe percentage of agreement was made between the diagnosis by laboratory and the algorithm created with respect to the ratio of PANBIO units.
bN.A. not apply.