Table 3.
Comparison of the current method for degradation of methyl orange with reported methods.
| Entry | Catalyst | Catalyst dose (mg) | Time (min) | Degradation (%) | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MnFe2O4 | 2.5 | 90 | 100 | Nguyen et al., 2011 |
| 2 | Iron nanoclusters | 1.25 | 360 | 95 | Ebrahiminezhad et al., 2018 |
| 3 | Co doped ZnO NPs | 0.5 | 90 | 100 | Ahmad, 2019 |
| 4 | NiO NPs | 5.0 | 05 | 95 | Barzinjy et al., 2020 |
| 5 | ZnO NPs | 3.0 | 100 | 81 | Gawade et al., 2017 |
| 6 | AgNPs/Acacia nilotica | 5.0 | 06 | 95 | Shah et al., 2020 |
| 7 | AgNPs/Bistorta amplexicaulis | 2.0 | 15 | 98 | Current work |