Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 22;7:585425. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.585425

Table 4.

Coping strategies (COPE-28) of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients based on non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH; absence and presence) and social support level (high and low) variables.

COPE-28 NASH:
Ma (SD)
Social support level:
Ma (SD)
Main effects Interaction effects
Absence (G1): n = 201 Presence (G2): n = 291 High (G3): n = 245 Low (G4): n = 247 NASH: F(1,488)p (db) Social support level: F(1,488)
p (db)
F(1,488) (p)
Active coping 1.96
(0.71)
1.87
(0.68)
2.21
(0.78)
1.62
(0.78)
1.95
0.16
(0.129 N)
74.35
<0.001
(0.756 M)
0.10
(0.92)
Planning 1.29
(0.99)
1.34
(1.02)
1.63
(0.94)
1.01
(1.10)
0.27
0.60
(−0.050 N)
45.29
<0.001
(0.606 M)
1.35
(0.25)
Instrumental support 1.15
(0.99)
1.14
(1.02)
1.40
(0.94)
0.88
(0.94)
0.02
0.88
(0.010 N)
33.89
<0.001
(0.553 M)
0.33
(0.56)
Emotional support 1.03
(0.99)
1.10
(1.02)
1.33
(0.94)
0.79
(0.94)
0.56
0.45
(−0.070 N)
35.66
<0.001
(0.574 M)
0.10
(0.75)
Self-distraction 0.67
(0.99)
0.82
(1.02)
0.68
(0.94)
0.80
(0.94)
2.53
0.11
(−0.149 N)
1.83
0.18
(−0.128 N)
1.23
(0.27)
Venting 0.98
(0.99)
1.02
(1.02)
1.17
(1.09)
0.83
(1.10)
0.15
0.70
(−0.040 N)
13.55
<0.001
(0.310 S)
0.75
(0.39)
Disengagement 0.30
(0.57)
0.31
(0.51)
0.14
(0.47)
0.47
(0.47)
0.11
0.74
(−0.018 N)
50.74
<0.001
(−0.702 M)
0.19
(0.66)
Positive reframing 1.35
(0.99)
1.16
(1.02)
1.58
(0.94)
0.93
(0.94)
4.33
0.04
(0.189 N)
52.02
<0.001
(0.691 M)
0.47
(0.49)
Denial 0.18
(0.42)
0.24
(0.34)
0.12
(0.47)
0.30
(0.47)
2.63
0.10
(−0.157 N)
21.32
<0.001
(−0.383 S)
4.14
(0.04)
Acceptance 2.04
(0.71)
1.99
(0.68)
2.29
(0.78)
1.75
(0.78)
0.64
0.42
(0.072 N)
61.92
<0.001
(0.692 M)
1.44
(0.23)
Religion 0.84
(1.13)
0.99
(1.19)
0.90
(1.25)
0.94
(1.26)
2.00 0.16
(−0.129 N)
0.117
0.73
(−0.032 N)
0.01
(0.94)
Humor 1.11
(0.99)
1.00
(1.02)
1.29
(1.09)
0.82
(0.94)
1.45
0.23
(0.109 N)
24.21
<0.001
(0.462 S)
0.02
(0.89)
Self-blame 0.55
(0.71)
0.50
(0.68)
0.39
(0.78)
0.66
(0.78)
0.43
0.51
(0.072 N)
18.35
<0.001
(−0.346 S)
1.94
(0.16)

A 2 × 2 factorial ANOVA (Snedecor's F) was applied.

a

Higher scores show more use of the coping strategy.

b

Effect sizes: N, null; S, small; M, medium.