Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 18;10(11):3907–3919. doi: 10.1534/g3.120.401612

Table 4. Comparison of giant sequoia v2.0 assembly and annotation to selected gymnosperm genome projects.

A Sequoiadendron giganteum Abies alba Picea glauca Pinus lambertiana Pinus taeda Pseudotsuga menzesii Ginkgo biloba Gnetum montanum
Reference Mosca et al., 2019 Warren et al., 2015 Stevens et al., 2016 Neale et al., 2014 Neale et al., 2017 Guan et al., 2016 Wan et al., 2018
Genome size (Mbp) 8,114 18,167 20,000 31,000 20,613 15,700 10,610 4,110
Chromosomes 11 12 12 12 12 12 12 22
TE content (%) 79 78 N/A 79 81 72 77 86
N50 scaffold
size (kb) 690,549 14.05 71.50 246 107 340 1,360 475
B Sequoiadendron giganteum Abies alba Picea glauca Pinus lambertiana Pinus taeda Pseudotsuga menzesii Ginkgo biloba Gnetum montanum
Number of genes 37,936 94,209 14,462 38,518 51,751 46,688 41,840 27,493
Average overall CDS size (bp) 1,084 629 1,421 1,102 1,131 1,180 1,186 1,290
Average size introns (bp) 4,067 315 603 11,468 5,596 4,685 7,884 1,769
Maximum intron size length (kb) 1,399.11 36.01 119.32 1,254.69 758.52 351.90 1,272.92 342.13

Assembly (A) and annotation (B) statistics for giant sequoia v2.0 compared to recent gymnosperm genome projects. A Genome size, TE content, and N50 scaffold size are as reported in the literature. B Number of genes, average coding sequence (CDS) size, average intron size, and maximum intron length as calculated by gFACs.