Table 2. Risk assessment for exposure to brucellosis in the pastoralist’s production system of Kajiado County.
Risk analysis
steps |
Description of evidence for
risk profile |
Estimates of
epidemiological data |
Systems affected | Authors |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hazard
identification |
Sero-Prevalence of Brucella in
animals and man. |
17% in man
(n=174), 13% in goats (n=400), 11% in cattle (n= 200) |
Pastoralists system in North Turkana |
Nanyende, 2007 (MSc
Thesis) |
Sero-prevalence of brucellosis
in animals and man |
Overall sero-prevalence for
the three counties (Kajiado, Kiambu and Marsabit) were:16% in humans and 8% in animals; human and livestock sero-prevalence was 3 and 4 times higher in Marsabit than in Kajiado, which was 6 and 3times higher than Kiambu respectively |
Extensive production system
(Kajiado and Marsabit) and intensive production system (Kiambu) |
Ogola et al. (2014). | |
Prevalence of Brucella in cattle
milk; |
Overall prevalence of 4.9%
by indirect ELISA and 3.9% by milk ring test (MRT) at consumer level and 2.4% -ELISA and 3.4% - MRT at informal market. |
Milk from Extensive
production system (Narok and Nakuru) and intensive production system (Nairobi and Kiambu |
Kang’ethe et al. (2007) | |
Hazard
characterisation |
Types of Brucella organisms
isolated in Kenya: Brucella abortus in cattle milk Brucella melitensis biovar 1 and Brucella abortus biovar 3 isolated in cattle |
Milk sampled from urban
consumers in Nairobi and Nakuru showed prevalence of 4.7% (n=10) by MRT and 5.1% (n=11) by ELISA; and from Rural consumers: 3.2% (n=7) by MRT and 4.6% (n=10) by ELISA. Brucella melitensis biovar one isolated from cattle milk from Central Kenya, and Brucella abortus biovar 3 from aborted foetal materials from cattle in Central and Eastern provinces of Kenya |
Milk from Extensive
production system (Narok and Nakuru) and intensive production system (Nairobi and Kiambu; Central province is characterized by intensive production system while Eastern is mainly characterised by semi- extensive production system |
Kang’ethe
et al. (2007)
Muendo et al. (2012) |
Exposure
assessment |
Exposure factors were:
• Consumption of unpasteurized milk • Consumption of raw meat • Consumption of raw blood • Handling infected aborted materials or assisting animals during parturition without protective gloves |
Peri-urban pastoralism
system and rural pastoralism system |
Current study | |
Risk
characterization and estimation |
Risk of human infection with
Brucella organisms is higher in rural pastoralism than in peri- urban areas |
Peri-urban areas and rural
pastoralism system |
Current study |
Key: number of study units or samples which were included for specific studies which were reviewed (n); Masters of Science (MSc); milk ring test (MRT); and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)