Table 3.
Risk of bias assessment of the retrospective comparative studies and prospective controlled studies.
Study | Selection | Comparability | Outcome | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Exposed cohort | Non-exposed cohort | Ascertainment of exposure | Outcome of interest | Assessment of outcome | Length of follow-up | Adequacy of follow-up | Total score | ||
Fan et al. | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
Francesco et al. | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
Francesco et al. | * | * | * | * | ** | * | * | * | 9 |
Hu et al. | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
Liu et al. | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
Wang et al. | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
Wang et al. | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
Wu et al. | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
Wu et al. | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | * | 8 |
Risk of bias was assessed with use of the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. “*” means a score of 1; “**” means a score of 2; the total score of this scale is 9. A higher overall score corresponds to a lower risk of bias; a total score of 5 or less indicates a high risk of bias.