Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 22;10:551985. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.551985

Table 3.

Risk of bias assessment of the retrospective comparative studies and prospective controlled studies.

Study Selection Comparability Outcome
Exposed cohort Non-exposed cohort Ascertainment of exposure Outcome of interest Assessment of outcome Length of follow-up Adequacy of follow-up Total score
Fan et al. * * * * * * * * 8
Francesco et al. * * * * ** * * * 9
Francesco et al. * * * * ** * * * 9
Hu et al. * * * * * * * * 8
Liu et al. * * * * * * * * 8
Wang et al. * * * * * * * * 8
Wang et al. * * * * * * * * 8
Wu et al. * * * * * * * * 8
Wu et al. * * * * * * * * 8

Risk of bias was assessed with use of the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. “*” means a score of 1; “**” means a score of 2; the total score of this scale is 9. A higher overall score corresponds to a lower risk of bias; a total score of 5 or less indicates a high risk of bias.