TABLE 2.
Correlations between dimensions of AIS, MLQ, and PWB (N = 102).
| Variables | AI | SM | PM | SA | PR | AU | EM | PL | PG | GW |
| 1. AI | ||||||||||
| 2. SM | 0.15 | |||||||||
| 3. PM | 0.42*** | 0.28** | ||||||||
| 4. SA | 0.62*** | 0.37*** | 0.46*** | |||||||
| 5. PR | 0.42*** | 0.31** | 0.28** | 0.41*** | ||||||
| 6. AU | 0.11 | 0.27** | 0.15 | 0.32** | 0.023* | |||||
| 7. EM | 0.76*** | 0.21* | 0.45*** | 0.68*** | 0.48*** | 0.19t | ||||
| 8. PL | 0.12 | 0.23* | 0.30** | 0.09 | 0.27** | –0.03 | 0.16t | |||
| 9. PG | 0.35*** | 0.36*** | 0.33*** | 0.53*** | 0.36*** | 0.38*** | 0.44*** | 0.40*** | ||
| 10. GW | 0.61*** | 0.44*** | 0.50*** | 0.77*** | 0.70*** | 0.51*** | 0.75*** | 0.48*** | 0.76*** |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001. ttendency; AI, acceptance of illness; SM, search for meaning; PM, presence of meaning; SA, self-acceptance; PR, positive relations; AU, autonomy; EM, environmental mastery; PL, purpose in life; PG, personal growth; GW, general well-being.