Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 4;10:19031. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75931-8

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Comparison of calculated performance for DGSPR and single-resonator 16-element supercells. (a) Color map of calculated reflection coefficient amplitude with imposed contours representing reflected phase for DGSPR (left panel) and single-resonator (right panel) unit cells for system parameters of Px=Py=330nm, tm=ts=70nm,dx=90nm, tb=g=50nm, λ0=900nm and normal incident TM polarized light. For the single-resonator unit cell the dx and g parameters are ignored as they are meaningless, and the nanobrick is centered on the unit cell. The separation between phase contours is 22.5 for the detuned resonators and 90 for the single resonators. Circular markers represent nanobricks selected for supercell modeling. (b) Supercell sketches for beam steering along the positive x-direction for DGSPR and single-resonator configurations and for both TM and TE polarization. (c) Calculated diffraction efficiencies for orders |m|3 as a function of wavelength of incident light for TM and TE polarization and for DGSPR and single-resonator supercells indicated by solid and dashed lines, respectively.