Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 4;20:478. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01763-z

Table 1.

Basic characteristics of the included studies

First author Year Country Study design Data source Follow-up (y) Sample size Type of DM Male (%) Age at baseline (y) Diagnosis of DR
Sabanayagam [11] 2019 Singapore Prospective cohort study Population-based Median 8.8 2964 T2DM: 98.2% 50.6 40–80 Fundus photography
Takao [12] 2020 Japan Retrospective cohort study Hospital-based Median 18.6 1902 T2DM 80.3 Mean 55.6 Ophthalmoscope FFA
Kim [13] 2002 Korea Prospective cohort study Hospital-based 2 365 T2DM NA NA Ophthalmoscope
Rajala [14] 2000 Finland Prospective cohort study Hospital-based 4 428 T2DM: majority 31.8 27–88 Fundus photography
Hsieh [15] 2017 China Retrospective cohort study Hospital-based Median 6.6 761 T2DM 56.4 Mean 63.6 Ophthalmoscope FFA
Juutilainen [16] 2007 Finland Prospective cohort study Population-based 18 824 T2DM 51.6 45–64 Ophthalmoscope
Liew [17] 2008 Australia Prospective cohort study Population-based 12 199 T2DM NA NA Fundus photography
Lövestam-Adrian [18] 2006 Sweden Prospective cohort study Hospital-based 10 363 T2DM 64.5 Mean 54.1 Fundus photography
Mottl [19] 2014 United States Prospective cohort study Hospital-based Mean 5 3210 T2DM 61.8 Mean 61.3 Fundus photography
Ono [20] 2002 Japan Retrospective cohort study Hospital-based Median 11.6 223 T2DM 77.1 Mean 60.3 Fundus photography FFA

DM: diabetes mellitus, DR: diabetic retinopathy, FFA: fundus fluorescein angiography, NA: not available