Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 5;20:667. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03259-2

Table 2.

Family planning characteristics in the study participants

Characteristics Mean (SD) Range Spearman rank correlation test Spearman rank correlation coefficient
Distance to family planning service (km) 2.2 (2.0) 0.1–20 0.033 c −0.096 d
Birth Interval in years (n = 241) 4.85 (3.1) 1–17 0.484 c 0.003 d
Characteristics N (%) LMUP Score a p value
Parity (n = 494)
 Primiparity 199 (40.3) 11 (10–12) 0.002 b
 Multiparity 295 (59.7) 11 (4–12)
Miscarriages
 No 395 (79.9) 11 (6–12) 0.237 b
 Yes 99 (20.1) 11 (10–12)
Family planning precise (n = 494)
 Ever used 349 (70.6) 11 (5–12) < 0.001 b
 Never used 145 (29.3) 11 (10–12)
Most recent practice (n = 349)
 Natural or traditional methods 143 (40.9) 11 (7–12) 0.04 b
 Modern methods 206 (59.1) 10 (3.7–12)
Modern method used (n = 206)
 Oral contraceptive pills (OCP) 102 (49.5) 10 (3–12) 0.04 e
 Condoms 43 (20.8) 11 (4–12)
 Depot medoxy acetic acid (DMPA) 29 (14.7) 9 (2–11)
 Intrauterine contraceptive devices (IUCD) 25 (12.1) 11 (10–12)
 Implants 7 (3.4) 11 (6–11)
Knowledge on emergency contraceptives
 Not adequate 265 (53.6) 11 (5.5–12) 0.037 b
 Adequate 229 (46.4) 11 (9–12)

a Data are presented as median [interquartile range]

b Mann–Whitney U tests

c P value of Spearman rank correlation test

d Spearman rank correlation between the written characteristics and the LMUP value

e Kruskal–Wallis tests