Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 1;9(21):7863–7878. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3312

TABLE 1.

Demographic, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns for patients with BRAF‐mutant advanced melanoma

Overall (n = 224) aPD‐1 (n = 81) BRAF/MEKi (n = 143)
Median age at 1L initiation, years (range) 61 (26, 90+) 62 (26, 90+) 61 (28, 90+)
Race, n (%)
White 201 (89.7) 69 (85.2) 132 (92.3)
Unknown 18 (8.0) 7 (8.6) 11 (7.7)
Other 5 (2.2) 5 (6.2) 0 (0.0)
Male sex, n (%) 141 (62.9) 50 (61.7) 91 (63.6)
Median follow‐up time from 1L initiation, months (range) 11.5 (0.2, 58.2) 11.3 (0.4, 41.9) 11.5 (0.2, 58.2)
ECOG performance status at 1L initiation, n (%)
0‐1 142 (63.4) 61 (75.3) 81 (56.6)
2+ 35 (15.6) 4 (4.9) 31 (21.7)
Not documented 47 (21.0) 16 (19.8) 31 (21.7)
Stage at diagnosis, n (%)
Stage I/II 21 (9.4) 6 (7.4) 15 (10.5)
Stage III/IV 167 (74.6) 51 (63.0) 116 (81.1)
Not documented 36 (16.1) 24 (29.6) 12 (8.4)
PD‐L1 status, n (%)
Positive 9 (4.0) 6 (7.4) 3 (2.1)
Negative 16 (7.1) 9 (11.1) 7 (4.9)
Not documented 199 (88.8) 66 (81.5) 133 (93.0)
LDH status at 1L initiation a , n (%)
Normal 93 (41.5) 41 (50.6) 52 (36.4)
Elevated 53 (23.7) 15 (18.5) 38 (26.6)
Not documented 78 (34.8) 25 (30.9) 53 (37.1)
Sites of metastases at 1L initiation, n (%)
Other 150 (67.0) 45 (55.6) 105 (73.4)
Lung 101 (45.1) 23 (28.4) 78 (54.5)
Brain 70 (31.3) 17 (21.0) 53 (37.1)
Bone 59 (26.3) 17 (21.0) 42 (29.4)
Liver 51 (22.8) 7 (8.6) 44 (30.8)
Metastatic status at 1L initiation, n (%)
M0 1 (0.4) 0 (0.0) 1 (0.7)
M1a 19 (8.5) 9 (11.1) 10 (7.0)
M1b 26 (11.6) 9 (11.1) 17 (11.9)
M1c 145 (64.7) 44 (54.3) 101 (70.6)
Mx 33 (14.7) 19 (23.5) 14 (9.8)
Median time from advanced melanoma diagnosis to 1L initiation, months (range) 1.1 (0.0, 43.2) 1.4 (0.0, 43.2) 1.0 (0.0, 27.1)
Median duration of 1L therapy, months (range) 5.0 (0.0, 57.4) 3.7 (0.0, 41.9) 5.4 (0.0, 57.4)
1L regimen, n (%)
Dabrafenib/trametinib 129 (57.6) 0 (0.0) 129 (90.2)
Pembrolizumab 55 (24.6) 55 (67.9) 0 (0.0)
Nivolumab 26 (11.6) 26 (32.1) 0 (0.0)
Cobimetinib/vemurafenib 14 (6.3) 0 (0.0) 14 (9.8)
Radiation prior to 1L initiation, n (%) 85 (37.9) 30 (37.0) 55 (38.5)
Prior radiation and brain metastases at 1L initiation, n (%) 48 (21.4) 13 (16.0) 35 (24.5)
Surgical resection prior to 1L initiation, n (%) 155 (69.2) 61 (75.3) 94 (65.7)
Patients who discontinued 1L treatment, n (%) 196 (87.5) 62 (76.5) 134 (93.7)
Reasons for 1L treatment discontinuation, n (%)
Disease progression 79 (40.3) 28 (45.2) 51 (38.1)
Other 29 (14.8) 10 (16.1) 19 (14.2)
Treatment‐related toxicities 26 (13.3) 7 (11.3) 19 (14.2)
Death 16 (8.2) 2 (3.2) 14 (10.4)
Patient choice 6 (3.1) 4 (6.5) 2 (1.5)
Decline in ECOG 6 (3.1) 1 (1.6) 5 (3.7)
Unknown 54 (27.6) 14 (22.6) 40 (29.9)
Patients who advanced to 2L, n (%) 119 (53.1) 35 (43.2) 84 (58.7)
Median duration of 2L therapy, months (range) 2.1 (0.0, 34.6) 2.8 (0.0, 34.6) 2.1 (0.0, 25.1)
2L regimen, n (% of 2L initiators)
Pembrolizumab 31 (26.1) 2 (5.7) 29 (34.5)
Nivolumab/ipilimumab 26 (21.8) 3 (8.6) 23 (27.4)
Dabrafenib/trametinib 20 (16.8) 20 (57.1) 0 (0.0)
Nivolumab 16 (13.4) 0 (0.0) 16 (19.0)
Ipilimumab 9 (7.6) 3 (8.6) 6 (7.1)
Other b 17 (14.3) 7 (20.0) 10 (11.9)
Reasons for 2L treatment initiation, n (% of 2L initiators)
Progression on prior therapy 80 (67.2) 26 (74.3) 54 (64.3)
Other 16 (13.4) 5 (14.3) 11 (13.1)
Toxicity on prior therapy 10 (8.4) 4 (11.4) 6 (7.1)
Unknown 15 (12.6) 1 (2.9) 14 (16.7)
Patients who discontinued 2L treatment, n (% of 2L initiators) 100 (84.0) 26 (74.3) 74 (88.1)
Reasons for 2L treatment discontinuation, n (% of 2L discontinuations)
Disease progression 21 (21.0) 4 (15.4) 17 (23.0)
Treatment‐related toxicities 14 (14.0) 8 (30.8) 6 (8.1)
Patients who advanced to 3L, n (% of 2L discontinuations) 40 (17.9) 5 (6.2) 35 (24.5)

Abbreviations: 1L, first‐line; 2L, second‐line; 3L, third‐line; aPD‐1, anti‐PD‐1 monotherapies; BRAF/MEKi, BRAF/MEK inhibitors; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PD‐L1, programmed death ligand‐1.

a

LDH thresholds were recorded in the EHR based on individual laboratory specifications; standard reference ranges were not used.

b

Other 2L treatments were received by fewer than five patients in each cohort.