TABLE 3.

Relationship between Emotional Suppression, Caregiver Vigilance, and measures of affect^a

	Model 1				Model 2
	Emotional Suppression β (SE)	t	${\eta }_{\text{p}}^2$	P	Caregiver Vigilance β (SE)	t	${\eta }_{\text{p}}^2$	P
Negative Affect
PROMIS Depression	.26 (0.07)	3.73	0.08	.0003	.25 (0.08)	3.07	0.06	.0025
GAD-7 score	.17 (0.04)	3.95	0.09	.0001	.20 (0.05)	4.11	0.10	<.0001
PROMIS Anger	.24 (0.08)	3.03	0.05	.0029	.36 (0.09)	4.10	0.10	<.0001
NIHTB Perceived Stress	.40 (0.08)	4.75	0.13	<.0001	.33 (0.10)	3.24	0.07	.0015
TBI-CareQOL Caregiver-Specific Anxiety	.31 (0.06)	5.28	0.15	<.0001	.38 (0.07)	5.84	0.18	<.0001
Positive Affect
Neuro-QOL Positive Affect and Well-being	−.19 (0.06)	−3.36	0.07	.0010	−.16 (0.06)	−2.54	0.04	.012b
TBI-QOL Resilience	−.20 (0.07)	−2.90	0.05	.0043	−.14 (0.08)	−1.74	0.02	.0833b
NIHTB Self-efficacy	−.20 (0.08)	−2.42	0.04	.0168b	−.01 (0.09)	−0.15	0.00	.8796b
Family Resilience Scale for Veterans	−.06 (0.02)	−2.74	0.05	.0069	−.06 (0.03)	−2.31	0.03	.0221b
NIHTB General Life Satisfaction	−.27 (0.08)	−3.50	0.08	.0006	−.18 (0.09)	−2.09	0.03	.0382b

Abbreviations: GAD-7, General Anxiety Disorder 7-item; NIHTB, National Institutes of Health Toolbox; PROMIS, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; QOL, quality of life; TBI, traumatic brain injury.

^aAll models control for age, gender, and education of caregiver. ${\eta }_{\text{p}}^2$ effect sizes are small at 0.01, moderate at 0.06, and large at 0.14.

^bIndicates that overall adjusted model was insignificant (P > .05).