TABLE 4.

Relationship between Emotional Suppression, Caregiver Vigilance, and affect when Emotional Suppression and Caregiver Vigilance are both included in the model^a

	Emotional Suppression β (SE)	t	${\eta }_{\text{p}}^2$	P	Caregiver Vigilance β (SE)	t	${\eta }_{\text{p}}^2$	P
Negative Affect
PROMIS Depression	.20 (0.08)	2.62	0.04	.01	.14 (0.09)	1.62	0.02	.11
GAD-7 score	.11 (0.05)	2.38	0.04	.02	.14 (0.05)	2.63	0.04	.009
PROMIS Anger	.12 (0.09)	1.41	0.01	.16	.30 (0.10)	3.03	0.06	.003
NIHTB Perceived Stress	.34 (0.09)	3.61	0.08	.0004	.14 (0.11)	1.32	0.01	.19
TBI-CareQOL Caregiver-Specific Anxiety	.20 (0.06)	3.15	0.06	.002	.28 (0.07)	3.93	0.09	.0001
Positive Affect
Neuro-QOL Positive Affect and Well-being	−.15 (0.06)	−2.46	0.04	.02	−.08 (0.07)	−1.18	0.01	.24
TBI-QOL Resilience	−.18 (0.08)	−2.35	0.04	.02b	−.04 (0.09)	−0.51	0.00	.61b
NIHTB Self-efficacy	−.24 (0.09)	−2.63	0.04	.009b	.11 (0.10)	1.05	0.01	.29b
Family Resilience Scale for Veterans	−.05 (0.02)	−1.89	0.02	.06	−.03 (0.03)	−1.22	0.01	.23
NIHTB General Life Satisfaction	−.24 (0.09)	−2.83	0.05	.005	−.06 (0.10)	−0.61	0.00	.54

Abbreviations: GAD, General Anxiety Disorder 7-item; NIHTB, National Institutes of Health Toolbox; PROMIS, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; QOL, quality of life; TBI, traumatic brain injury.

^aAll models control for age, gender, and education of caregiver. ${\eta }_{\text{p}}^2$effect sizes are small at 0.01, moderate at 0.06, and large at 0.14.

^bIndicates that overall model was insignificant (P > .05).