Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 5.
Published in final edited form as: Risk Anal. 2018 Aug 16;38(10):2128–2143. doi: 10.1111/risa.13138

Table 6:

Partial correlations with judged probability of getting sick conditional on prevention.

Flu Heart disease

Had flu shot in year before survey
Intends to get flu shot during next winter
Ended up getting flu shot after survey

Has been taking aspirin
Intends to take aspirin during next 5 years
Getting sick without prevention
Open-ended .28***
(1761)
.30***
(1761)
.27***
(1469)
.37***
(1750)
.31***
(1750)
Visual linear scale .41***om
(1759)
.41***o
(1759)
.38***o
(1457)
.36***
(1750)
.33***
(1750)
Visual magnifier scale .34*** b
(1750)
.37*** b
(1750)
.31***
(1441)
.35***
(1742)
.31***
(1742)
Getting sick with prevention
Open-ended −.07**
(1761)
−.09***
(1761)
−.07*
(1469)
−.27***
(1750)
−.22***
(1750)
Visual linear scale −.20***o
(1759)
−.22***o
(1759)
−.20***o
(1457)
−.24***
(1750)
−.24***
(1750)
Visual magnifier scale −.16***o
(1750)
−.17**o
(1750)
−.13***
(1441)
−.25***
(1742)
−.23***
(1742)

Note: Reported findings were the same for raw responses vs. responses rounded to the nearest integer, due to these measures being correlated at r=1.00, p<.001. Correlations with judged probability of getting sick without prevention control for the judged probability of getting sick with prevention, and vice versa.

o

= significantly larger than for open-ended response mode (p<.05)

l

=significantly larger than for visual linear scale (p<.05)

m

=significantly larger than for visual magnifier scale (p<.05)