Skip to main content
. 2020 Jul 21;16(10):2341–2348. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1788299

Table 1.

A comparison of CD123-targeting therapies

Class Conjugated antibodies Bispecific antibodies CAR T cells
Availability for administration Immediate, off-the-shelf product and not patient specific Immediate, off-the-shelf product and not patient specific Requiring manufacturing, however, off-the-shelf allogeneic CARs are in development
Method of administration IV at repeated doses Varies from continuous IV infusion to long half-life BiTEs given as repeated IV dosing Usually single IV infusion
Lymphodepletion Not required Not required This is usually required
FDA approval Only tagraxofusp is approved for BPDCN None yet None yet
Stages in clinical studies Varied from phase 1 studies to phase 1b/II studies (IMGN632) Varied from phase 1 (JNJ-63709178, APVO436, XmAb14045) to phase 2/registry studies (flotetuzumab) Early phases
In combination therapy Actively being tested (tagraxofusp or IMNG632 in combination venetoclax + HMA) Actively being tested (flotetuzumab + MGA012) No, but dual “multi-target” CAR T cells are being tested
Main toxicity VOD, CLS CRS CRS
Product half-life Intermediate to long Usually very short, although, there are long half BiTEs (XmAb14045) Usually long but depends on the co-stimulatory domain and other characteristics

BiTE, bispecific T cell engager; BPDCN, blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm; CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; CLS, capillary leak syndrome; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; HMA, hypomethylating agent; IV, intravenous; VOD, veno-occlusive disease.