Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 30;11(3):e1. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2020.11301

Table 2.

Newcastle-Ottawa scale for assessing quality of non-randomized studies categorized as low-quality (0 - 3 stars), moderate quality (4 - 6 stars), and high quality (7 - 9 stars)

Study Year of
publication
Selection
(maximum 4 stars)
Comparability
(maximum 2 stars)
Outcome
(maximum 3 stars)
Total score/
quality
Misch et al [24] 1997 ★★★★ ★★ ☆★☆ 7 stars/high quality

Cordaro et al. [25] 2002 ★★★★ ★★ ☆★☆ 7 stars/high quality

Clavero et al. [26] 2003 ★★★★ ★★ ☆★☆ 7 stars/high quality

Silva et al. [27] 2006 ★★★★ ★★ ☆★☆ 7 stars/high quality

Raghoebar et al. [28] 2007 ★★★★ ★★ ☆★☆ 7 stars/high quality

Andersson et al. [29] 2008 ★★★★ ★★ ☆★☆ 7 stars/high quality

Cordaro et al. [30] 2011 ★★★★ ★★ ★★★ 9 stars/high quality

Altiparmak et al. [31] 2015 ★★★★ ★★ ☆★☆ 7 stars/high quality

Ersanli et al. [32] 2016 ★★★★ ★★ ☆★☆ 7 stars/high quality

Pereira et al. [33] 2019 ★★★★ ★★ ☆★☆ 7 stars/high quality