Table 4. Relationship of DTAC with eGFR and urine ACR.
| Tertiles of DTAC | ACR ≥ 30 mg/g | Tertiles of DTAC | eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | p value | OR (95% CI) | p value | ||||
| Crude | Crude | ||||||
| Tertile 1 (n = 72) | 1 reference | 0.15 | Tertile 1 (n = 76) | 1 reference | 0.99 | ||
| Tertile 2 (n = 71) | 2.03 (0.93–4.46) | 0.07 | Tertile 2 (n = 75) | 0.97 (0.51–1.87) | 0.94 | ||
| Tertile 3 (n = 66) | 1.97 (0.88–4.38) | 0.09 | Tertile 3 (n = 75) | 0.97 (0.51–1.87) | 0.94 | ||
| Model 1 | Model 1 | ||||||
| Tertile 1 (n = 70) | 1 reference | 0.12 | Tertile 1 (n = 74) | 1 reference | 0.93 | ||
| Tertile 2 (n = 71) | 2.25 (1.00–5.09) | 0.04* | Tertile 2 (n = 75) | 0.96 (0.49–1.88) | 0.90 | ||
| Tertile 3 (n = 65) | 1.94 (0.83–4.50) | 0.12 | Tertile 3 (n = 74) | 1.08 (0.54–2.15) | 0.81 | ||
| Model 2 | Model 2 | ||||||
| Tertile 1 (n = 70) | 1 reference | 0.13 | Tertile 1 (n = 74) | 1 reference | 0.91 | ||
| Tertile 2 (n = 71) | 2.24 (0.99–5.07) | 0.05 | Tertile 2 (n = 75) | 0.93 (0.47–1.84) | 0.84 | ||
| Tertile 3 (n = 65) | 1.94 (0.83–4.51) | 0.12 | Tertile 3 (n = 74) | 1.08 (0.54–2.15) | 0.81 | ||
| Model 3 | Model 3 | ||||||
| Tertile 1 (n = 70) | 1 reference | 0.21 | Tertile 1 (n = 74) | 1 reference | 0.43 | ||
| Tertile 2 (n = 71) | 2.11 (0.91–4.91) | 0.08 | Tertile 2 (n = 75) | 0.91 (0.44–1.86) | 0.80 | ||
| Tertile 3 (n = 65) | 1.58 (0.63–3.93) | 0.32 | Tertile 3 (n = 74) | 1.47 (0.68–3.18) | 0.32 | ||
Values are reported based on the logistic regression test (Model 1, adjusted for age, sex, physical activity, and socioeconomic status; Model 2, model 1 + systolic and diastolic blood pressure; Model 3, model 2 + weight, height, potassium, phosphorus, and animal protein intake).
DTAC, dietary total antioxidant capacity; eGRF, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ACR, albumin to creatinine ratio; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
*Significantly different between groups (p < 0.05).