Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 22;22(10):e20346. doi: 10.2196/20346

Table 2.

Summary of the studies based on the evaluation outcomes from the synthesis framework for the assessment of health information technologya.

First author (reference) Preventive care Adherence or attendance Efficiency Perceived ease of use or usefulness Effectiveness Performance Safety or privacy or security Acceptability Cost-effectiveness Appropriateness Satisfaction n (%)
Adams [9] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 10 (91)
Bibault [46] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 10 (91)
Borja-Harta [50] 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 7 (64)
Cameron [32] 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 5 (45)
Chaix [45] 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 8 (73)
Chang [8] 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 7 (64)
Crutzen [54] 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 9 (82)
Dimeff [42] 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 (91)
Elmasri [33] 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 5 (45)
Fitzpatrick [13] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 10 (91)
Friederichs [53] 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 4 (36)
Fulmer [34] 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 6 (55)
Galescu [52] 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 (27)
Ghosh [44] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 9 (82)
Havik [14] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 10 (91)
Heyworth [47] 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 8 (73)
Hudlicka [35] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 (100)
Inkster [36] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 9 (82)
Ireland [56]









1 1 (100)
Isaza- Restrepo [15] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 10 (91)
Ly [37] 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 5 (45)
Nakagawa [12] 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 7 (64)
Philip (2014) [51] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 10 (91)
Philip (2017) [38] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 9 (82)
Rhee [48] 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 9 (82)
Simon [49] 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 7 (64)
Spänig [43] 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 6 (55)
Washburn [41] 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 5 (45)
Wong [55] 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (9)
Xu [40] 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 (45)
Yasavur [39] 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 7 (64)
n (%) 17 (57) 19 (63) 22 (73) 27 (90) 23 (77) 26 (87) 14 (47) 20 (67) 5 (17) 24 (80) 26 (84)

aPositive or mixed results have been coded as 1, and neutral or negative results as 0.