Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 23;10:586101. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.586101

Table 2.

Variation in acidification and proteolytic activities in hMDM from healthy donors (n = 53) in response to IgG, TDM, and β- glucan beads.

Acidification 30 min 60 min 90 min
Range % CV (mean ± SD) P Range % CV (mean ± SD) P Range % CV (mean ± SD) P
IgG 0.99–1.13 2.75 (1.05 ± 0.03) 1.00–1.25 4.96 (1.13 ± 0.06) 1.02–1.29 5.69 (1.14 ± 0.07)
TDM 0.97–1.10 2.92 (1.02 ± 0.03) 0.6 1.00–1.19 4.34 (1.08 ± 0.05) 0.39 1.01–1.23 4.71 (1.11 ± 0.05) 0.34
β-glucan 0.98–1.10 2.53 (1.03 ± 0.03) 1.01–1.19 4.16 (1.09 ± 0.05) 1.01–1.25 4.9 (1.12 ± 0.05)
Proteolysis 60 min 120 min 180 min
Range % CV (mean ± SD) P Range % CV (mean ± SD) P Range % CV (mean ± SD) P
IgG 1.34–6.08 38.89 (2.48 ± 0.97) 2.22–21.06 48.82 (7.71 ± 3.76) 2.67–29.28 46.27 (11.25 ± 5.21)
TDM 1.41–5.91 38.75 (2.51 ± 0.97) 0.77 2.61–19.38 47.82 (7.16 ± 3.42) 0.96 3.27–24.57 44.68 (10.28 ± 4.59) 0.98
β-glucan 1.31–6.81 42.97 (2.62 ± 1.12) 2.82–22.04 50.15 (8.02 ± 4.02) 3.78–29.26 45.76 (11.55 ± 5.28)

Mean ± SD, Mean ± standard deviation; CV, coefficient variation, calculated by percentage of SD divided by mean.

P, P-value for comparison of coefficient variation in either acidification or proteolytic activity among three ligands.