Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 6;238(12):2805–2818. doi: 10.1007/s00221-020-05933-5

Table 5.

Results of cognitive tests given (T scores)

M1 M2 Statistics
Mean SEM Mean SEM (p  value; paired samples t test; *Wilcoxon signed rank test)
Attention
 Work performance series
  Total items worked 50.69 1.32 54.74 1.32 *p < 0.001
  Errors 43.08 1.70 42.33 1.61 *p = 0.63
  Increase of items worked 50.21 1.53 47.85 1.71 *p = 0.21
Executive function
 STROOP test
  Reading interference 51.15 1.42 51.23 1.28 p = 0.945
  Naming interference 52.51 1.52 53.85 1.39 p = 0.233
  Baseline condition: speed reading words 60.38 1.58 65.15 1.59 p < 0.001
  Baseline condition: speed naming colours 59.69 1.40 63.67 1.56 p < 0.001
  Interference condition: speed reading words 58.44 1.66 61.79 1.68 p = 0.001
  Interference condition: speed naming colours 59.33 1.74 63.44 1.76 p < 0.001
 Response inhibition
  Comission errors 49.92 1.21 52.31 1.39 *p = 0.082
  Omission errors 48.64 1.00 48.59 1.20 *p= 0.746
  Sensitivity index 50.31 1.21 52.18 1.57 p = 0.237
  Mean time “correct answers” 51.77 1.67 51.69 1.72 p = 0.939
 Working Memory
  N-back verbal
  Correct answers 65.36 2.73 70.23 2.39 *p = 0.012
  Omissions 59.36 2.45 64.90 2.42 *p = 0.011
  Errors 56.46 1.16 59.00 1.09 *p = 0.038
  Mean time “correct answers” 57.54 1.62 61.67 1.31 *p = 0.011
 California verbal learning test (CVLT)
  Learning sum 45.21 1.48 43.56 1.45 p = 0.181
  Delayed free recall I 48.18 1.28 50.33 1.66 p = 0.061
  Delayed free recall II 46.51 1.64 50.33 1.48 p = 0.007
  Cued recall I 46.92 1.35 46.69 1.73 p = 0.825
  Cued recall II 47.31 1.33 46.74 1.58 p = 0.601
  Semantic clustering 35.85 0.21 31.03 0.26 *p < 0.001
  Serial clustering 56.21 1.51 54.97 2.26 p = 0.578
  Learning curve 46.92 1.67 50.18 1.80 *p = 0.094