Table 3.
Relationship between flower visits, flower visitors and proportion exotic flower cover
| Response | Type | Fixed effect | Estimate ± SE | z | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flower visits | |||||
| Total flower visits | Poissona | Proportion exotic flower cover | 0.113 ± 0.113 | 0.994 | 0.320 |
| Visits to exotic flowers | Poissona | Proportion exotic flower cover | 0.844 ± 0.162 | 5.220 | < 0.001 |
| Visits to native flowers | Poissona | Proportion exotic flower cover | − 0.327 ± 0.114 | − 2.868 | 0.004 |
| Proportion visits to exotic flowers | Binomiala | Proportion exotic flower cover | 1.220 ± 0.178 | 6.840 | < 0.001 |
| Flower visitors | |||||
| Flower-visitor species richness | Poissona | Proportion exotic flower cover | 0.161 ± 0.094 | 1.763 | 0.084 |
| Proportion non-honey bee visits | Binomiala | Proportion exotic flower cover | − 0.131 ± 0.136 | − 0.966 | 0.334 |
Reported model parameters have been estimated with glmms (see ‘Type’) and are excerpts from the full models shown in Table S2. p values are based on z statistics. Significant relationships (at p < 0.05) are in bold. Each variable accounted for 1 df in the nominator of the 137 df in the denominator
aModel with observation-level random effect