Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 20;194(3):465–480. doi: 10.1007/s00442-020-04785-8

Table 3.

Relationship between flower visits, flower visitors and proportion exotic flower cover

Response Type Fixed effect Estimate ± SE z p value
Flower visits
 Total flower visits Poissona Proportion exotic flower cover 0.113 ± 0.113 0.994 0.320
 Visits to exotic flowers Poissona Proportion exotic flower cover 0.844 ± 0.162 5.220  < 0.001
 Visits to native flowers Poissona Proportion exotic flower cover − 0.327 ± 0.114 − 2.868 0.004
 Proportion visits to exotic flowers Binomiala Proportion exotic flower cover 1.220 ± 0.178 6.840  < 0.001
Flower visitors
 Flower-visitor species richness Poissona Proportion exotic flower cover 0.161 ± 0.094 1.763 0.084
 Proportion non-honey bee visits Binomiala Proportion exotic flower cover − 0.131 ± 0.136 − 0.966 0.334

Reported model parameters have been estimated with glmms (see ‘Type’) and are excerpts from the full models shown in Table S2. p values are based on z statistics. Significant relationships (at p < 0.05) are in bold. Each variable accounted for 1 df in the nominator of the 137 df in the denominator

aModel with observation-level random effect