Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 18;38(11):2863–2872. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03102-5

Table 1.

Baseline, treatment, and surgical characteristics of patients who underwent single-stage buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for radiation-induced bulbomembranous urethral stricture

Patient number; N (%) 47 (100)
Age at surgery (years); median (IQR) 70 (65–74)
ASA™ score; N (%)
 1 2 (4.3)
 2 22 (47)
 3 23 (49)
 4 0 (0)
Body mass index; median (IQR) 27 (26–30)
Coronary heart disease; N (%) 17 (36)
Diabetes mellitus; N (%) 10 (21)
Hypertension; N (%) 32 (68)
Smoking status; N (%)
 Never 19 (40)
 Ever 28 (60)
Anticoagulants/antiplatelets; N (%)
 None 25 (53)
 Aspirin 15 (32)
 Clopidogrel 1 (2.1)
 Oral anticoagulants* 6 (13)
RT indication; N (%)
 Prostate cancer 45 (96)
 Rectal cancer 1 (2.1)
 Bladder cancer 1 (2.1)
RT modality; N (%)
 LDR brachytherapy 5 (11)
 External beam RT 33 (70)
 HDR brachytherapy + external beam RT 8 (17)
 High-intensity focused ultrasound 1 (2.1)
Prostate cancer surgery (N = 45); N (%)
 None 12 (26)
 Radical prostatectomy 24 (51)
 TURP 10 (21)
 Retropubic adenomectomy 1 (2.1)
History of direct vision internal urethrotomy; N (%)
 None 18 (38)
 1 12 (26)
 2–5 15 (32)
 ≥ 6 2 (4.3)
History of urethroplasty; N (%)
 None 45 (96)
 1 1 (2.1)
 ≥ 2 1 (2.1)

Proportions may not add up to 100%, as they are rounded

ASA™ American Society of Anesthesiologists™, HDR high dose rate, IQR interquartile range, LDR low dose rate, RT radiation therapy, TURP transurethral resection of the prostate

*Patients with oral anticoagulants were switched to a low-molecular-weight heparin preoperatively

One patient underwent TURP and subsequent high-intensity focused ultrasound