Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 17;21(6):511–526. doi: 10.1007/s10162-020-00768-x

Table 1.

Details of the subjects who took part in the experiments. Subjects were either implanted in the UK and tested in Cambridge (UK) or implanted in Denmark and tested in Lyngby (DK). Information regarding the duration of deafness was not available (N.A.) for all listeners

Listener Sex Age Onset of hearing loss Implant type Country Years of implant use Duration of deafness
AB01 M 73 Post-lingual, progressive HR90k Advantage/HiFocus MS UK 9 N.A.
AB02 F 50 Post-lingual, progressive HR90k/HiFocus 1J UK 10 16
AB03 M 71 Post-lingual, progressive HR90k/HiFocus 1J UK 9 N.A.
AB05 M 75 Post-lingual, progressive HR90k/HiFocus 1J UK 7 30
AB06 F 68 Peri-lingual, progressive HR90k/HiFocus 1J UK 3 25
AB09 M 71 Post-lingual, progressive HR90K Advantage/HiFocus MS UK 4 N.A.
AB13 M 78 Post-lingual, progressive HR90k/HiFocus 1J UK 10 10
AB24 F 47 Post-lingual, sudden HR90k Advantage/HiFocus MS UK 1 1
AB27 M 78 Post-lingual, progressive HiRes Ultra/HiFocus ms UK 0.5 30
S1-DK F 27 Post-lingual, progressive HR90k/HiFocus 1J DK 4 4
S2-DK F 60 Post-lingual, progressive HR90k/ HiFocus 1J DK 8 N.A.