Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2020 Sep 14;27(11):1086–1093. doi: 10.1038/s41594-020-0501-x

TABLE 1:

Cryo-EM data collection, refinement and validation statistics

DUOX1–DUOXA1 (apo) (EMDB-21962, PDB 6WXR) DUOX1–DUOXA1 (dimer of dimers) (EMDB-21963, PDB 6WXU) DUOX1–DUOXA1 (with NADPH) (EMDB-21964, PDB 6WXV)
Data collection and processing
Magnification 81,000 81,000
Voltage (kV) 300 300
Electron exposure (e–/Å2) 65.4 80.5
Defocus range (μm) 1.1–2.0 1.1–2.0
Pixel size (Å) 1.08 1.08
Symmetry imposed C1 C2 C1
Initial particle images (no.) ~2,200,000 1,486,046
Final particle images (no.) 534,337 302,097 667,038
Map resolution (Å) 3.2 2.7 3.3
 FSC threshold 0.143 0.143 0.143
Map resolution range (Å) 3.2–200 2.7–200 3.3–200
Refinement
Initial model used (PDB code) de novo de novo de novo
Model resolution (Å) 3.2 2.7 3.3
 FSC threshold 0.143 0.143 0.143
Model resolution range (Å) 3.2–200 2.7–200 3.3–200
Map sharpening B factor (Å2) −135 −105 −125
Model composition
 Non-hydrogen atoms 10,410 18,419 10,610
 Protein residues 1,303 2,212 1,319
 Ligands 4 8 5
B factors (Å2)
 Protein 36.06 67.61 41.73
 Ligand - - 30.07
R.m.s. deviations
 Bond lengths (Å) 0.003 0.006 0.004
 Bond angles (°) 0.716 0.694 0.702
Validation
 MolProbity score 1.90 1.71 1.82
 Clashscore 8.68 3.62 8.23
 Poor rotamers (%) 0.19 1.95 0
Ramachandran plot
 Favored (%) 93.31 95.18 94.46
 Allowed (%) 6.69 4.82 5.54
 Disallowed (%) 0 0 0