Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 3;6(11):e04989. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04989

Table 5.

ANOVA on the ease with which farmers get support from different support institutions in three agro-ecological zones in Limpopo.

Variation in ease of accessing Agro Finance institutions
SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Arid Agro finance 200 10 0.05 0.047739
Semi-Arid Agro finance 200 10 0.05 0.047739
Humid Agro finance 200 15 0.075 0.069724
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 0.083333333 2 0.041667 0.756654 0.469683 3.010815
Within Groups 32.875 597 0.055067
Total 32.95833333 599

Variation in ease of accessing DAFF
SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Arid DAFF 200 55 0.275 0.200377
Semi arid DAFF 200 46 0.23 0.17799
Humid DAFF 200 48 0.24 0.183317
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 0.223333333 2 0.111667 0.596421 0.551107 3.010815
Within Groups 111.775 597 0.187228
Total 111.9983333 599

Variation in ease of accessing NGO
ANOVA: Single Factor
SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Arid NGO 200 59 0.295 0.20902
semi arid NGO 200 59 0.295 0.20902
Humidv NGO 200 66 0.33 0.222211
ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Between Groups 0.163333333 2 0.081667 0.382662 0.68221 3.010815
Within Groups 127.41 597 0.213417
Total 127.5733333 599