Table 5.
ANOVA on the ease with which farmers get support from different support institutions in three agro-ecological zones in Limpopo.
| Variation in ease of accessing Agro Finance institutions | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SUMMARY | ||||||
| Groups | Count | Sum | Average | Variance | ||
| Arid Agro finance | 200 | 10 | 0.05 | 0.047739 | ||
| Semi-Arid Agro finance | 200 | 10 | 0.05 | 0.047739 | ||
| Humid Agro finance | 200 | 15 | 0.075 | 0.069724 | ||
| ANOVA | ||||||
| Source of Variation | SS | df | MS | F | P-value | F crit |
| Between Groups | 0.083333333 | 2 | 0.041667 | 0.756654 | 0.469683 | 3.010815 |
| Within Groups | 32.875 | 597 | 0.055067 | |||
| Total | 32.95833333 | 599 | ||||
|
Variation in ease of accessing DAFF | ||||||
| SUMMARY | ||||||
| Groups | Count | Sum | Average | Variance | ||
| Arid DAFF | 200 | 55 | 0.275 | 0.200377 | ||
| Semi arid DAFF | 200 | 46 | 0.23 | 0.17799 | ||
| Humid DAFF | 200 | 48 | 0.24 | 0.183317 | ||
| ANOVA | ||||||
| Source of Variation | SS | df | MS | F | P-value | F crit |
| Between Groups | 0.223333333 | 2 | 0.111667 | 0.596421 | 0.551107 | 3.010815 |
| Within Groups | 111.775 | 597 | 0.187228 | |||
| Total | 111.9983333 | 599 | ||||
|
Variation in ease of accessing NGO | ||||||
| ANOVA: Single Factor | ||||||
| SUMMARY | ||||||
| Groups | Count | Sum | Average | Variance | ||
| Arid NGO | 200 | 59 | 0.295 | 0.20902 | ||
| semi arid NGO | 200 | 59 | 0.295 | 0.20902 | ||
| Humidv NGO | 200 | 66 | 0.33 | 0.222211 | ||
| ANOVA | ||||||
| Source of Variation | SS | df | MS | F | P-value | F crit |
| Between Groups | 0.163333333 | 2 | 0.081667 | 0.382662 | 0.68221 | 3.010815 |
| Within Groups | 127.41 | 597 | 0.213417 | |||
| Total | 127.5733333 | 599 | ||||