Table 6.

ANOVA on the variation in the number of support types received by farmers in three agro-ecological zones in Limpopo.

Variation in
SUMMARY
Groups	Count	Sum	Average	Variance
Arid	200	25	0.125	0.109925
Semi-arid	200	35	0.175	0.145101
Humid	200	40	0.2	0.160804
ANOVA
Source of Variation	SS	df	MS	F	P-value	F crit
Between Groups	0.583333	2	0.291667	2.10423	0.122843	3.010815
Within Groups	82.75	597	0.13861
Total	83.33333	599
Variation in seed support
SUMMARY
Groups	Count	Sum	Average	Variance
Arid	200	146	0.73	0.19809
Semi-arid	200	115	0.575	0.245603
Humid	200	140	0.7	0.211055
ANOVA
Source of Variation	SS	df	MS	F	P-value	F crit
Between Groups	2.703333	2	1.351667	6.193215	0.002177	3.010815
Within Groups	130.295	597	0.21825
Total	132.9983	599
Variation in machinery support
SUMMARY
Groups	Count	Sum	Average	Variance
Arid	200	57	0.285	0.204799
Semi-arid	200	75	0.375	0.235553
Humid	200	75	0.375	0.235553
ANOVA
Source of Variation	SS	df	MS	F	P-value	F crit
Between Groups	1.08	2	0.54	2.396788	0.091885	3.010815
Within Groups	134.505	597	0.225302
Total	135.585	599
Variation in educational support
SUMMARY
Groups	Count	Sum	Average	Variance
Arid	200	133	0.665	0.223894
Semi-arid	200	98	0.49	0.251156
Humid	200	76	0.38	0.236784
ANOVA
Source of Variation	SS	df	MS	F	P-value	F crit
Between Groups	8.263333	2	4.131667	17.41276	0.0001	3.010815
Within Groups	141.655	597	0.237278
Total	149.9183	599
Variation in other support
SUMMARY
Groups	Count	Sum	Average	Variance
Arid	200	63	0.315	0.216859
Semi-arid	200	60	0.3	0.211055
Humid	200	69	0.345	0.227111
ANOVA
Source of Variation	SS	df	MS	F	P-value	F crit
Between Groups	0.21	2	0.105	0.480898	0.618468	3.010815
Within Groups	130.35	597	0.218342
Total	130.56	599