Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 3;6(11):e04989. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04989

Table 8.

Factor Analysis of support types in three agro-ecological zones in Limpopo.

Area Support type F1 F2 Initial communality Final communality Specific variance
Arid Monetary 0.539012 0.260437 0.358396 0.358361 0.641638554
Seeds 0.70481 -0.58056 0.734206 0.833805 0.166195147
Machinery 0.900081 0.434636 0.876024 0.999054 0.000946069
Education 0.764503 -0.5478 0.753925 0.884553 0.115446629
Others (irrigation, animals, fertilizers) 0.869904 0.34072 0.871943 0.872824 0.127176191
Area Support type F1 Initial communality Final communality Specific variance
Semi-arid Monetary 0.636556 0.494949 0.405203 0.594797
Seeds 0.754645 0.710145 0.569489 0.430511
Machinery 0.927924 0.806316 0.861044 0.138956
Education 0.869807 0.804422 0.756564 0.243436
Others (irrigation, animals, fertilizers) 0.863223 0.776786 0.745154 0.254846
Humid Monetary 0.671018 0.474638 0.450265 0.549735
Seeds 0.507419 0.262673 0.257474 0.742526
Machinery 0.988201 0.981714 0.976541 0.023459
Education 0.981327 0.979104 0.963003 0.036997
Others (irrigation, animals, fertilizers) 0.959075 0.89 0.919825 0.080175

F: load of a variable in a factor. Bold Figure: factors most responsible for the total degree of fluctuation of the considered variable.