Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 2;42:e2020038. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2020038

Table 2.

Characteristics of the articles included in this review

Study Name and timeframe of databases searched Name and timeframe of databases searched Country or locations of the primary studies Quality of the review Sample size and characteristics
Morgan et al., 2009 [40] MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar, and additional sources; 1970-2008 7 studies on mental health outcomes: 5 cohort studies, 2 cross-sectional and series interviews Not specified Medium Sample size ranged from 8 to 43; participants in 7 selected studies; most (n=6) studies recruited hospitalized patient populations, 1 study included both patients and providers
Abad et al., 2010 [41] MEDLINE and CINAHL; 1966-2009 8 cohort studies and 7 case-control studies Not specified Medium Sample size ranged from 16 to 156; most studies had adult participants; 2 studies recruited children; samples were recruited from hospital wards
Barratt et al., 2011 [42] MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Library Databases; 1990-2010 Studies were qualitative (n=7), cohort (n=7), cross-sectional (n=6), case studies (n=2), and review (n=1) Most studies were from the UK (n=6) followed by the US (n=4), Hong Kong (n=1), and Canada (n=1) Medium Sample size ranged from 7 to 300; samples were recruited from different clinical settings
Gammon et al., 2018 [43] PubMed and ASSIA; 1990-2017 Not specified Not specified Medium Sample size ranged from 13 to 41 among studies reporting sample sizes; participants were recruited from different hospital wards
Gammon et al., 2019 [28] MEDLINE and ASSIA; 1990-2017 14: only 1 study was cohort-based; most studies were cross-sectional, and 10 studies had a qualitative design Most studies were from the UK (n=6), followed by the US (n=2), Sweden (n=2), and 1 study each from the Netherlands, New Zealand, Ireland, and Brazil High Sample size ranged from 1 to 528; most studies recruited patients and providers from clinical settings, whereas 2 samples included nursing students
Brooks et al., 2020 [29] MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Web of Science; timeframe not specified 25: cross-sectional (n=11), qualitative (n=7), longitudinal (n=1), observational (n=2), mixed methods (n=3), and psychological evaluation (n=1) Most studies were conducted in Canada (n=8) and China (n=4); 2 studies each from Taiwan, Australia, Korea, and Liberia; 1 study each from Sierra Leone, Senegal, Hong Kong, and Sweden; 1 study had participants both from the US and Canada Medium Sample size ranged from 10 to 6,231; diverse samples including patients, providers, students, institutional stakeholders, and community members were recruited
Purssell et al., 2020 [44] Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO; from the inception of the databases until December 2018 26: cohort (n=12), case-control (n=6), cross-sectional (n=4), and quasi-experimental (n=2) studies Most studies were from the US (n=14), followed by the UK (n=3), Canada (n=3), and 1 study each from Spain, Turkey, Netherlands, Singapore, France, and 1 study had participants both from the US and Canada High Sample size ranged from 14 to 9,684; patients were recruited from diverse clinical settings
Sharma et al., 2020 [45] Embase, PubMed, and Google Scholar; studies published through March 2019 7: cohort (n=4), quasi-experimental (n=2), and not specified (n=1) Not specified High Sample size ranged from 16 to 148; participants were recruited from diverse clinical settings

CINAHL, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; ASSIA, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts.