Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 23;17(17):2696–2702. doi: 10.7150/ijms.50657

Table 4.

Fit factor comparisons for exercises and total scores between surgical and other masks versus FFP3 filtering respirators.

Surgical and other masks (n = 78) FFP3 filtering respirators (n = 78) Surgical vs FFP3 filtering respirators*
Mean SD Median 95% CI limits Mean SD Median 95% CI limits t (77) P d
Lower Upper Lower Upper
Exercise 1 5.3 17.5 2.1 1.4 9.2 101.7 157.0 42.0 66.9 136.6 -5.381 <0.001 0.61
Exercise 2 4.7 11.7 2.2 2.1 7.3 82.1 100.1 46.0 59.9 104.3 -6.783 <0.001 0.77
Exercise 3 4.4 11.6 2.1 1.8 7.0 78.4 85.5 51.5 59.4 97.3 -7.492 <0.001 0.85
Exercise 4 3.9 9.1 2.1 1.9 5.9 70.4 78.5 42.0 53.0 87.8 -7.402 <0.001 0.84
Exercise 5 5.9 17.1 2.7 2.1 9.7 54.0 45.5 39.0 43.9 64.1 -8.633 <0.001 0.98
Exercise 6 2.6 2.3 2.0 2.1 3.1 29.1 33.6 16.5 21.6 36.6 -7.070 <0.001 0.81
Exercise 7 2.8 4.3 1.9 1.9 3.8 38.7 39.8 24.5 29.9 47.6 -7.960 <0.001 0.91
Exercise 8 3.5 7.7 2.0 1.8 5.2 69.6 86.5 47.0 50.4 88.8 -6.739 <0.001 0.77
Total score 3.2 5.0 2.1 2.1 4.3 40.7 37.8 28.5 32.3 49.1 -8.733 <0.001 1.00

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; FFP, filtering face pieces; SD, standard deviation; t, Student t statistic for a 95% CI (degrees of freedom); d, Cohen d statistic for effect size. *Student t test for related samples were applied for a P < 0.05 as statistically significant for a 95% CI.