Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 7;12(11):e12525. doi: 10.15252/emmm.202012525

Figure EV4. LSD1 inhibition induces marked transcriptional changes.

Figure EV4

  • A
    Volcano plot showing the −log10 (adjusted P‐value) and log2 fold change (log2FC) for transcripts detected by RNAseq analysis of PeTa cells treated with 100 nM GSK‐LSD1 or DMSO for 6 days. Significantly up‐ and downregulated genes (FDR ≤ 0.05; abs[log2FC] ≥ 1) are marked in red and blue, respectively.
  • B
    Immunoblot analysis for histone marks and LSD1 upon GSK‐LSD1 and protein level quantification normalized to loading control (vinculin) and relative to DMSO control.
  • C
    Pathway enrichment analysis (GO:BP) of 533 significantly downregulated genes upon GSK‐LSD1 treatment displayed in Fig 4D.
  • D
    Pathway enrichment analysis (GO:BP) of 870 significantly upregulated genes upon GSK‐LSD1 treatment displayed in Fig 4F.
  • E
    Cell viability (%) upon 4‐thiouridine (4sU) treatment in PeTa cells over time relative to treatment start (T 0). Data are represented as means ± SD.
  • F
    Heatmap depicting the transcriptional activation of members of TGFβ signaling after 24‐h treatment with LSD1i.
  • G
    Immunoblot probing for protein levels of phospho‐SMAD1/5/9, ID1, and ID2 in PeTa cells treated with indicated compounds for 24 h. Vinculin serves as loading control.

Source data are available online for this figure.