Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 5;10:19174. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76197-w

Table 3.

Anthracnose resistance and DTF QTLs in F2 and F2:3 population of L. luteus, detected by interval mapping and genome-wide composite interval mapping.

QTL Pop LG Interval mapping Genome-wide composite inteval Mapping
Position (cM) Marker interval LOD Add Dom PVE (%) Position (cM) Marker interval LOD Add Dom PVE (%)
Anthracnose resistance F2 13 67.7 sca82470 56.5 1.8 − 0.3 74.9 67.7 sca82470 61.93 1.73 0 73.06
F2:3 13 67.7 sca82470 32.7 9.0 − 3.9 77.8
DTF F2 4 nd nd nd nd nd nd 81 sca409063~13840_95_80 4.74 0 1.72 0.4
10 nd nd nd nd nd nd 52.5 13561_55_79 5.08 − 1.5 0 0.6
11 nd nd nd nd nd nd 48 10497_69_66~sca172949 12.50 − 3.39 0 3.2
23 68.1 sca43802 68.4 − 16.1 − 9.5 81.4 68.2 sca43802~13204_107_42 94.53 − 16.15 − 8.97 82.7
F2:3 23 68.1 sca43802 15.0 − 4.6 − 0.7 30.8

Pop. population evaluated, LG linkage group, PVE proportion of phenotypic variance explained by QTL, Add additive effect, Dom dominance effect, not analyzed in F2:3 family, nd not detected.