Table 2.
Patient–Control Subject Comparisons for Subdivision Kicer Values
| Subdivision (Kicer∗102) | Control Subjects (n = 21) | Patients (n = 29) | Responders (n = 11) | p Value (Control Subject–Patient) (df = 48) | p Value (Control Subject–Responder) (df = 30) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whole Striatum | 1.29 (0.11) | 1.28 (0.10) | 1.34 (0.08) | .78 | .16 |
| Associative Striatum | 1.29 (0.11) | 1.29 (0.10) | 1.35 (0.088) | .73 | .14 |
| Limbic Striatum | 1.29 (0.12) | 1.26 (0.10) | 1.31 (0.08) | .45 | .54 |
| Sensorimotor Striatum | 1.30 (0.14) | 1.30 (0.10) | 1.35 (0.10) | .98 | .20 |
| AUD | 1.22 (0.15) | 1.21 (0.18) | 1.20 (0.18) | .27 | .85 |
| CON | 1.33 (0.20) | 1.20 (0.14) | 1.36 (0.15) | .61 | .66 |
| DAT | 1.22 (0.18) | 1.28 (0.15) | 1.34 (0.15) | .24 | .028 |
| DMN | 1.12 (0.16) | 1.17 (0.16) | 1.25 (0.09) | .27 | .009 |
| SMN | 1.28 (0.15) | 1.24 (0.15) | 1.27 (0.13) | .30 | .75 |
Data are expressed as mean (SD). The p values were calculated using an independent samples t test.
AUD, auditory network; CON, cingulo-opercular network; DAT, dorsal attention network; DMN, default mode network; SMN, sensorimotor network.