Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Nov 6.
Published in final edited form as: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2021 Mar 1;16(6):1165–1183. doi: 10.1177/1745691620968766

Table 3:

Descriptive statistics and study characteristics for studies that examined association between gender nonconformity and internalized homonegativity.

Study Correlation Coefficient Coefficient 95% Confidence Interval Total Sample Size Mean Age Adolescent vs. Adult Measure of Gender Noncon- formity Gender Country
1 D’Augelli (2008) −0.065 −0.150, 0.021 523 17.03 Adolescent Both C USA
2 Dragowski (2011) −0.090 −0.194, 0.016 345 19 Adult Childhood C USA/Canada/ New Zealand
3 Everett (2019) −0.170 −0.246, −0.092 612 39.17 Adult Current F USA
4 Feinstein (2012) 0.030 −0.061, 0.120 467 31.24 Adult Childhood C --
5 Lehavot (2011) −0.110 −0.162, −0.058 1381 33.54 Adult Current F USA
6 Pachankis (2006) −0.350 −0.522, −0.150 87 20.4 Adult Childhood M USA
7 Pachankis (2015) −0.030 −0.131, 0.072 374 37 Adult Childhood M USA
8 Puckett (2016) −0.040 −0.140, 0.060 383 39.3 Adult Current C USA
9 Reisen (2013) −0.130 −0.240, −0.017 301 41 Adult Current M USA
10 Sandfort (2016) −0.237 −0.365, −0.100 196 26.7 Adult Current M South Africa
11 Timmins (2018) 0.190 −0.138, 0.480 38 29.2 Adult Childhood C Multiple
12 Timmins (2019) 0.040 0.010, 0.070 4248 29.9 Adult Childhood C Multiple
13 Van Beusekom (2018) −0.113 −0.184, −0.040 724 31.42 Adult Current M, F Netherlands
14 Woodford (2014) −0.090 −0.201, 0.024 299 24 Adult Current C USA
   Average −0.085 −0.139, −0.030 712.71 29.92
   Total 9978

Notes: -- Information was not provided in manuscript; M: results separately reported for men; F: results separately reported for women; C: only results combined for men and women reported.