Table 5.
Other QoL measures rather than SF / RAND, as predictor of all-cause mortality
| Author (Year) | Comparison | Effect estimate (95% CI) |
|---|---|---|
| Core CDC Healthy Days Measures (HRQOL-4) (General Health) categorised | ||
| Brown et al. 2015a [38] | HR, Excellent vs. Poor | 0.24 (0.21–0.27) |
| Dominick et al. 2002a [44] | RR, Excellent vs. Poor | 0.24 (0.17–0.33) |
| WHO QOL – BREF (Overall) | ||
| Kao et al. 2005 [54] | RR, 1-point change | 0.99 (0.77–1.26) |
| Murray et al. 2011 [63] | HR, 1-tertile increase | 0.84 (0.67–1.05) |
| WHO QOL (Categorised) | ||
| Gomez-Olive et al. 2014a [25] | HR, Highest vs. Lowest | 0.61 |
| Razzaque et al. 2014a [69] | RR, Good vs. Bad |
0.26 (0.16–0.41) men 0.30 (0.10–0.86) women |
| Psychological General Well-being (PGWB) (Global Score) continuous | ||
| Nilsson et al. 2011a [66] | RR, 1-unit change |
0.984 (0.969–0.998) men 0.994 (0.978–1.010) women |
| Lancashire Quality-of-life Profile-Residential (LQOLP-R) incorporated the Spitzer Uniscale | ||
| Sutcliffe et al. 2007 [72] | HR, increased score | 0.9805 (0.9704–0.9907) |
| Chinese 35-item Quality of Life (QOL-35) categorised | ||
| Xie et al. 2014a [77] | HR, Upper 50% vs. Lower 50% | 0.69 (0.49–1.00) |
| The Health Utilities Index Mark 3 Version (HUI3) continuous | ||
| Feeny et al. 2012 [48] | HR, 1-level increase |
Hearing: 0.18 (0.06–0.57) Ambulation: 0.10 (0.04–0.23) Pain: 0.53 (0.29–0.96) |
| Kaplan et al. 2007 [55] | HR, 1-unit increase | Overall: 0.61 (0.42–0.89) |
| The EuroQoL-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) continuous | ||
| Cavrini et al. 2012 [39] | HR, 1-unit increase | 0.42 (0.35–0.50) |
| The EuroQoL-5 Dimension EQ-5D categorised | ||
| Jia et al. 2018a [53] | HR, 5th Quintile vs. 1st Quintile | 0.45 (0.43–0.49) |
| Short Form Six Dimension Utility Index (SF-6D) continuous | ||
| Myint et al. 2010a [26] | HR, 1SD 0.12-point increase | 0.74 (0.69–0.79) |
| Short Form Six Dimension Health Utility Measure (SF-6D) categorised | ||
| Jia et al. 2018a [53] | HR, 5th Quintile vs. 1st Quintile | 0.77 (0.71–0.80) |
| Goteborg Quality of Life Assessment | ||
| Tibblin et al. 1993 [73] | Only Health variable was significantly related to mortality (No data available) | |
awhere studies report reverse association or risk estimate per more than 1-unit increase, the risk estimates were standardised per 1-unit increase or 1-SD increase or high vs. low for the purpose of consistency across the table