Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 7;43(4):776–784. doi: 10.2337/dc19-2202

Table 3.

Diabetes risk according to quintiles of cumulative average dietary intakes of heme, nonheme, and total iron in men (n = 8,346) and women (n = 8,680)

Quintiles of intake in men Quintiles of intake in women
1 (n = 1,669) 2 (n = 1,669) 3 (n = 1,669) 4 (n = 1,669) 5 (n = 1,669) P- trend 1 (n = 1,736) 2 (n = 1,736) 3 (n = 1,736) 4 (n = 1,736) 5 (n = 1,736) P- trend
Heme iron
 Median intake (mg/day)* 0.07 0.4 0.75 1.21 2.16 0.06 0.33 0.63 1.01 1.76
 Cases/person-years 115/21,486 124/22,053 106/20,463 112/19,477 90/17,287 152/21,389 115/22,202 118/20,725 102/19,484 90/17,569
 Model 1 1 (ref) 0.96 (0.75–1.24) 0.90 (0.69–1.17) 1.02 (0.79–1.33) 0.96 (0.73–1.27) 0.97 1 (ref) 0.77 (0.61–0.98) 0.84 (0.66–1.08) 0.73 (0.57–0.95) 0.91 (0.70–1.18) 0.518
 Model 2 1 (ref) 0.89 (0.69–1.15) 0.78 (0.59–1.03) 0.84 (0.63–1.12) 0.78 (0.57–1.05) 0.167 1 (ref) 0.72 (0.56–0.92) 0.75 (0.58–0.96) 0.64 (0.49–0.84) 0.76 (0.57–1.02) 0.118
 Model 3 1 (ref) 0.86 (0.64–1.15) 0.75 (0.53–1.07) 0.77 (0.53–1.14) 0.68 (0.44–1.05) 0.155 1 (ref) 0.74 (0.56–0.97) 0.78 (0.56–1.07) 0.68 (0.47–0.98) 0.84 (0.56–1.26) 0.982
Nonheme iron
 Median intake (mg/day) 17 19.91 22.02 24.48 29.29 14.97 17.39 19.14 21.26 25.38
 Cases/person-years 95/17,678 104/21,419 110/21,397 107/21,754 131/18,518 106/17,324 99/21,069 105/22,265 133/22,193 134/18,518
 Model 1 1 (ref) 0.78 (0.59–1.03) 0.75 (0.57–1.00) 0.69 (0.52–0.92) 1.02 (0.78–1.34) 0.486 1 (ref) 0.67 (0.51–0.88) 0.65 (0.50–0.86) 0.72 (0.56–0.94) 1.00 (0.77–1.29) 0.247
 Model 2 1 (ref) 0.76 (0.58–1.01) 0.73 (0.55–0.97) 0.68 (0.51–0.90) 0.99 (0.76–1.30) 0.615 1 (ref) 0.65 (0.49–0.86) 0.62 (0.47–0.82) 0.71 (0.55–0.93) 0.98 (0.76–1.27) 0.257
 Model 3 1 (ref) 0.77 (0.58–1.02) 0.72 (0.54–0.97) 0.63 (0.46–0.85) 0.87 (0.64–1.19) 0.683 1 (ref) 0.63 (0.48–0.84) 0.57 (0.43–0.76) 0.58 (0.43–0.77) 0.67 (0.49–0.91) 0.080
Total iron
 Median intake (mg/day) 17.92 20.86 23.03 25.43 30.6 15.7 18.17 19.95 22.05 26.45
 Cases/person-years 106/18,038 101/21,223 103/21,882 110/21,647 127/17,976 112/17,628 82/21,216 130/22,417 123/22,372 130/17,736
 Model 1 1 (ref) 0.73 (0.56–0.97) 0.66 (0.50–0.87) 0.69 (0.53–0.91) 1.00 (0.77–1.29) 0.505 1 (ref) 0.57 (0.43–0.77) 0.78 (0.61–1.01) 0.70 (0.54–0.91) 1.03 (0.80–1.33) 0.150
 Model 2 1 (ref) 0.73 (0.55–0.96) 0.65 (0.49–0.85) 0.67 (0.51–0.88) 0.94 (0.73–1.23) 0.793 1 (ref) 0.55 (0.42–0.74) 0.75 (0.58–0.96) 0.69 (0.53–0.90) 0.99 (0.77–1.28) 0.198
 Model 3 1 (ref) 0.73 (0.55–0.96) 0.61 (0.46–0.82) 0.60 (0.44–0.80) 0.81 (0.60–1.11) 0.513 1 (ref) 0.54 (0.41–0.72) 0.68 (0.52–0.89) 0.57 (0.43–0.76) 0.70 (0.52–0.96) 0.203

Data are HR (95% CI) calculated by using Cox proportional hazards analyses. Model 1: adjusted for age, BMI, dietary intake of TE. Model 2: model 1 + residence area, highest education level, household income level, PAL, smoking status, alcohol consumption, and history of hypertension at baseline. Model 3: model 2 + dietary intake of carbohydrates, protein, ratio of MUFA-to-SFA intake, ratio of PUFA-to-SFA intake, cholesterol, magnesium, cereal fiber, vegetables, and fruits. Mutual adjustment was performed for dietary heme iron and nonheme iron. Tests for linear trend for HRs were conducted using the median value for each quintile of intake as a continuous variable. ref, reference.

*

Intakes were estimated as energy-adjusted cumulative average intake from baseline and follow-up periods.