Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 22;15(11):1614–1621. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05880420

Table 3.

Reliability for the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Hemodialysis Fatigue and Spearman rho correlations between Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Hemodialysis Fatigue and the 12-Item Short Form Survey, Functional Assessment Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue, and the Visual Analog Scale

Country Cronbach α for Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Hemodialysis Fatigue Intraclass Correlationa (95% Confidence Interval) Spearman Correlationb
12-Item Short Form Survey Functional Assessment Chronic Illness Therapy–Fatigue Visual Analog Scale
Mental Composite Score Physical Composite Score
United Kingdom, n=303 0.86 0.68 (0.61 to 0.73) −0.53 (−0.64 to −0.40) −0.45 (−0.57 to −0.31) −0.83 (−0.87 to −0.77) 0.61 (0.54 to 0.68)
Australia, n=106 0.81 0.74 (0.63 to 0.82) −0.30 (−0.64 to 0.14) −0.46 (−0.74 to −0.05) −0.75 (−0.85 to −0.60) 0.67 (0.55 to 0.76)
Romania, n=76 0.83 0.72 (0.57 to 0.82) −0.52 (−0.72 to −0.25) −0.53 (−0.72 to −0.26) −0.72 (−0.88 to −0.43) 0.65 (0.50 to 0.76)
a

Intraclass correlation for time point 1 and time point 2. Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Hemodialysis Fatigue was recorded in two different time points (time point 1 and time point 2), 1 week apart, prior to commencing the second dialysis session of the week.

b

The 95% confidence intervals are in parentheses.