Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 12;15(11):1603–1613. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04350420

Table 2.

Interfacility variation in mineral metabolism treatment strategies presented as median odds ratio (95% confidence interval)

Treatment Strategies Median Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval) by Cohort Year
All 2006–2008 2009–2011 2012–2015
Vitamin D alone 1.8 (1.6 to 2.0) 2.0 (1.8 to 2.5) 1.5 (1.3 to 1.9) 1.9 (1.6 to 2.8)
No mineral metabolism medication 2.0 (1.8 to 2.3) 1.7 (1.5 to 2.0) 1.8 (1.6 to 2.2) 3.2 (2.7 to 4.0)
Cinacalcet-containing 1.9 (1.7 to 2.1) 1.7 (1.5 to 2.1) 2.0 (1.8 to 2.5) 2.6 (2.2 to 3.2)
Phosphate binder alone 1.9 (1.8 to 2.1) 1.6 (1.5 to 1.8) 1.9 (1.7 to 2.1) 3.5 (3.0 to 4.2)
Number of groups (facilities) 359 253 257 265
Number of patients 15,591 5399 5225 4967

The reference strategy is vitamin D sterol and phosphate binder. Model is adjusted for age (linear and quadratic term), comorbidity, sex, race (Black, White, and other), and insurance status. The median odds ratio for a specified strategy describes the effect of the facility on receiving that strategy, rather than the reference strategy, for two otherwise similar patients. A median odds ratio near one implies facility variation plays a minor role in the probability of receiving the specified strategy; larger values indicate greater discrepancies across facilities, after controlling for patient characteristics. A median odds ratio of 1.8 implies a median increase of 80% in the odds of using that strategy (relative to the reference strategy) when a patient is switched from a facility with lower odds to one with greater odds, holding all other predictors constant.