Skip to main content
. 2019 May;6(5):427–436. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(19)30048-3

Table 3.

PAFs for daily use of cannabis and use of high-potency cannabis in the whole sample and by site

Fully adjusted OR (95% CI) Prevalence of exposure in controls Prevalence of exposure in cases PAF (95% CI)
High-potency cannabis (THC ≥10%)
Whole sample 1·6 (1·2–2·2) 19·1% 35·1% 12·2% (3·0–16·1)*
London (UK) 2·4 (1·4–4·0) 26·0% 51·5% 30·3% (15·2–40·0)*
Cambridge (UK) 1·3 (0·4–4·3) 11·0% 34·7% 8·2% (0·5–18·7)
Amsterdam (Netherlands) 3·6 (1·5–7·7) 54·0% 69·6% 50·3% (27·4–66·0)*
Gouda and Voorhout (Netherlands) 1·5 (0·8–3·1) 18·2% 36·0% 12·2% (8·7–25·3)*
Paris (Val-de-Marne; France) 2·1 (0·8–3·6) 21·0% 35·9% 18·9% (14·6–36·0)*
Puy de Dôme (France) 1·5 (0·4–5·8) 3·7% 7·1% 2·3% (0·6–17·2)
Madrid (Spain) 2·0 (0·7–5·7) 15·1% 34·0% 17·2% (0·9–25·0)
Barcelona (Spain) 1·6 (0·5–5·1) 7·8% 13·2% 4·7% (0·5–12·4)
Bologna (Italy) 1·2 (0·8–1·7) 8·7% 11·1% 1·9% (0·6–16·3)
Palermo (Italy) 0·6 (0·1–2·5) 5·2% 4·3% Not calculated
Ribeirão Preto (Brazil) 2·1 (0·6–11·3) 1·5% 3·6% 1·9% (0·3–4·1)
Daily cannabis use
Whole sample 3·2 (2·2–4·1) 6·8% 29·5% 20·4% (17·6–22·0)*
London (UK) 3·6 (1·4–4·4) 11·7% 29·0% 21·0% (11·1–31·2)*
Cambridge (UK) 2·2 (0·8–6·5) 4·0% 20·2% 10·4% (4·7–21·0)*
Amsterdam (Netherlands) 7·1 (3·4–11·8) 13·1% 51·0% 43·8% (34·0–69·1)*
Gouda and Voorhout (Netherlands) 2·8 (1·4–20·3) 6·0% 27·0% 17·4% (1·1–23·1)*
Paris (Val-de-Marne; France) 2·8 (1·7–12·3) 11·6% 32·3% 20·8% (13·5–36·1)*
Puy de Dôme (France) 1·1 (0·4–12·2) 6·0% 11·0% 1·2% (0·8–15·4)
Madrid (Spain) 2·5 (2·1–7·3) 10·5% 21·2% 12·7% (3·7–14·2)*
Barcelona (Spain) 1·8 (0·8–8·7) 8·3% 18·9% 8·6% (0·6–9·9)
Bologna (Italy) 2·0 (0·5–5·8) 4·1% 17·3% 8·2% (0·8–11·7)
Palermo (Italy) 1·7 (0·7–9·7) 5·1% 17·1% 6·3% (0·9–21·1)
Ribeirão Preto (Brazil) 2·4 (1·5–7·5) 7·4% 25·0% 14·5% (10·2–24·1)*

OR=odds ratio. PAF=population attributable fraction.

*

p<0·05.