Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 2;13:1415–1426. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S275601

Table 4.

Factors Affecting ANC Service Attendance Among Pregnant Women in Arba Minch Zuria Woreda, Gamo Gofa Zone, South Ethiopia, March 2015

Variables Category Attendance to ANC Service Crude OR (95% CI) Adjusted OR (95% CI)
Yes No
Educational status Illiterate 160 (31.9%) 94 (45.9%) 1 1
Read and write 44 (8.8%) 27 (13.2%) 0.96 (0.56–1.65) 0.61 (0.28–1.33)
Primary education 224 (44.7%) 63 (30.7%) 2.09 (1.43–3.05)b 1.37 (0.75–2.51)
Secondary education 73 (14.6%) 21 (10.2%) 2.04 (1.18–3.53)b 0.65 (0.25–1.66)
Marital status In marital union 486 (96.8%) 190 (92.7%) 1 1
Not in marital union 16 (3.2%) 15 (7.3%) 0.42 (0.21–0.86)b 0.39 (0.16–0.97)c
Occupation Farmer 231 (46%) 107 (52.2%) 1 1
Housewives 185 (36.9%) 64 (31.2%) 1.34 (0.93–1.93) 1.55 (0.93–2.58)
Othersa 86 (17.1%) 34 (16.6%) 1.17 (0.74–1.85) 1.44 (0.73–2.85)
Quintiles of wealth/SES Low 116 (23.%) 87 (42.4%) 1 1
Low–medium 104 (20.8%) 45 (22%) 1.73 (1.12–2.71)b 1.54 (0.81–2.92)
Medium–high 84 (16.8%) 39 (19%) 1.62 (1.01–2.58)b 1.30 (0.63–2.69)
High 196 (39.2%) 34 (16.6%) 4.33 (2.74–6.84)b 2.62 (1.29–5.29)c
Ever listened to radio Yes 286 (41%) 84 (57%) 1.91 (1.37–2.65)b 1.03 (0.61–1.75)
No 216 (59%) 121 (43%) 1 1
Food insecure Yes 248 (49.4%) 136 (66.3%) 0.49 (0.35–0.69)b 0.50 (0.32–0.79)c
No 254 (50.6%) 69 (33.7%) 1 1
Planned pregnancy Yes 335 (66.7%) 85 (41.5%) 2.83 (2.03–3.96)b 1.82 (1.16–2.85)c
No 167 (33.3%) 120 (58.5%) 1 1
Parity One 158 (36.9%) 45 (29%) 1 1
Two to four 238 (55.6%) 94 (60.6%) 0.72 (0.48–1.08) 0.76 (0.47–1.24)
Five and above 32 (7.5%) 16 (10.3%) 0.57 (0.28–1.13) 1.15 (0.49–2.69)
Place of last birth At home 223 (51.7%) 116 (73.4%) 1 1
At health institution 208 (48.3%) 42 (26.6%) 2.57 (1.73–3.84)b 1.47 (0.92–2.35)
History of still birth Yes 48 (11.1%) 22 (13.9%) 0.77 (0.45–1.33) 0.68 (0.34–1.37)
No 383 (88.9%) 136 (86.1%) 1 1
History of abortion/miscarriage Yes 82 (19.1%) 32 (20.1%) 0.94 (0.59–1.48) 0.85 (0.46–1.55)
No 347 (80.9%) 127 (79.9%) 1 1
Knowledgeable on danger signs Yes 393 (78.3%) 92 (44.9%) 4.43 (3.13–6.27)b 1.12 (0.41–3.04)
No 109 (21.7%) 113 (55.1%) 1 1
Perceived risk from danger signs Yes 377 (75.1%) 84 (41%) 4.34 (3.08–6.13)b 4.32 (1.60–11.67)c
No 125 (24.9%) 121 (59%) 1 1

Notes: aCarpenter, daily laborer, etc. bSignificant at bivariate analysis at P-value of <0.25, cSignificant at multivariable analysis at P-value of <0.05. Adjusted for women’s educational status, marital status, occupation, habit of listening radio, household wealth and food insecurity status, parity, plan of pregnancy, place of previous birth, history of still birth, history of abortion/miscarriage, knowledge on danger signs and perceived risk from danger signs.

Abbreviations: SES, socio-economic status; COR, crude odds ratio; AOR, adjusted odds ratio.