Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 2;12:11063–11075. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S275321

Table 4.

The Difference of RAPSN Methylation Levels Between Female LC Cases and Controls by Quartile Analyses

CpG Sites Methylation Control (N) Case (N) OR (95% CI) a p-value
RAPSN_CpG_1.15 Q4 (≥0.97) 36 19 1.00 (reference) -
Q3 (0.94–0.97) 54 45 1.86 (0.88–3.93) 0.105
Q2 (0.92–0.94) 21 15 1.61 (0.64–4.05) 0.313
Q1 (<0.92) 29 21 1.47 (0.66–3.28) 0.346
RAPSN_CpG_2 Q4 (≥0.89) 38 14 1.00 (reference) -
Q3 (0.83–0.89) 27 16 1.86 (0.76–4.56) 0.174
Q2 (0.77–0.83) 42 44 3.60 (1.60–8.08) 0.002
Q1 (<0.77) 33 26 2.49 (1.09–5.72) 0.031
RAPSN_CpG_3.4 Q4 (≥0.98) 39 21 1.00 (reference) -
Q3 (0.96–0.98) 39 34 1.69 (0.83–3.44) 0.151
Q2 (0.94–0.96) 33 21 1.26 (0.57–2.76) 0.564
Q1 (<0.94) 29 24 1.59 (0.74–3.40) 0.237
RAPSN_CpG_5 Q4 (≥0.99) 39 15 1.00 (reference) -
Q3 (0.96–0.99) 52 46 2.55 (1.21–5.35) 0.014
Q2 (0.95–0.96) 16 14 2.61 (0.99–6.85) 0.052
Q1 (<0.95) 33 25 2.11 (0.94–4.70) 0.069
RAPSN_CpG_6 Q4 (≥0.96) 39 28 1.00 (reference) -
Q3 (0.90–0.96) 35 25 0.99 (0.49–2.01) 0.976
Q2 (0.86–0.90) 30 26 1.18 (0.57–2.45) 0.651
Q1 (<0.86) 35 21 0.83 (0.40–1.72) 0.614
RAPSN_CpG_7.14 Q4 (≥0.94) 37 25 1.00 (reference) -
Q3 (0.91–0.94) 46 37 1.23 (0.61–2.45) 0.564
Q2 (0.89–0.91) 35 17 0.74 (0.33–1.64) 0.461
Q1 (<0.89) 22 21 1.42 (0.64–3.15) 0.390
RAPSN_CpG_8 Q4 (≥0.99) 57 39 1.00 (reference) -
Q3 (0.98–0.99) 20 14 1.10 (0.48–2.54) 0.825
Q2 (0.96–0.98) 38 30 1.24 (0.63–2.45) 0.540
Q1 (<0.96) 25 17 1.01 (0.48–2.11) 0.986
RAPSN_CpG_9 Q4 (≥0.92) 38 24 1.00 (reference) -
Q3 (0.88–0.92) 35 31 1.60 (0.76–3.36) 0.213
Q2 (0.84–0.88) 34 32 1.68 (0.81–3.48) 0.165
Q1 (<0.84) 33 13 0.61 (0.27–1.40) 0.246
RAPSN_CpG_10.11 Q4 (≥0.92) 41 24 1.00 (reference) -
Q3 (0.89–0.92) 29 26 1.53 (0.74–3.19) 0.255
Q2 (0.86–0.89) 37 24 1.11 (0.54–2.30) 0.774
Q1 (<0.86) 33 26 1.35 (0.65–2.77) 0.421
RAPSN_CpG_12 Q4 (≥0.95) 41 30 1.00 (reference) -
Q3 (0.92–0.95) 41 37 1.30 (0.66–2.53) 0.447
Q2 (0.90–0.92) 24 15 0.90 (0.40–2.06) 0.807
Q1 (<0.90) 34 18 0.73 (0.35–1.53) 0.405

Note: alogistic regression adjusted for age, gender and experimental batches; p< 0.05 was considered as significant difference.

Abbreviations: LC, lung cancer; N, number; OR, odd ratio; CI, confidence interval.