Table 4.

Results of analysis of the effects of the intervention on secondary outcomes for boys and girls

		Mean scores over time				Model results
Boys		Baseline	Midline	Endline	% change baseline to endline	EMD	LCL	UCL	P value
Gender attitudes scores (low = good)	Control	18.6	16.2	16.3	12.4
	Intervention	18.6	17.1	16.0	14.0	−0.65	−1.27	−0.04	0.037
School performance score	Control	9.4	9.1	9.2	−2.1
	Intervention	9.3	9.1	9.3	0.0	0.12	−0.05	0.29	0.178
Corporal punishment experience at school	Control	5	4.4	3.6	28.0
	Intervention	4.7	4	2.6	44.7	−0.80	−1.15	−0.45	<0.001
Physical punishment experience at home	Control	1.1	0.67	0.52	52.7
	Intervention	1.1	0.66	0.42	61.8	−0.14	−0.24	−0.04	0.005
Number of days missed	Control	4	4.4	6.8	−70.0
	Intervention	4	4.2	6.2	−55.0	−0.28	−0.97	0.42	0.440
Promised in marriage (%)	Control	8.9	7.1	8.9	0.0
	Intervention	7.8	7.6	6.4	17.9	0.69*	0.38	1.25	0.226
Girls
Gender attitudes scores (low = good)	Control	16.4	14.5	14.1	14.0
	Intervention	16.7	14.1	13.7	18.0	−1.32	−1.92	−0.73	<0.001
School performance score	Control	9.7	9.8	9.9	2.1
	Intervention	9.5	9.4	9.7	2.1	−0.07	−0.24	0.09	0.372
Corporal punishment experience at school	Control	1.2	1.2	0.82	31.7
	Intervention	1.7	1.5	0.58	65.9	−0.47	−1.14	−0.46	<0.001
Physical punishment experience at home	Control	0.54	0.43	0.27	50.0
	Intervention	0.56	0.42	0.13	76.8	−0.14	−0.24	−0.05	0.003
Number of days missed	Control	3.0	3.3	4.1	36.7
	Intervention	3.2	3.5	4.6	43.8	0.13	−0.55	0.81	0.702
Promised in marriage (%)	Control	3.2	5.6	4.9	53.1
	Intervention	5.9	4.3	4.5	23.7	0.63*	0.34	1.16	0.131

EMD: Estimated mean difference in scores between intervention and control groups.

*Adjusted odds ratio.