Table 2.
Frequency of evaluators’ ratings on how well faculty teams conducted OSAD category elements during debriefings
| OSAD Category Element | Evaluator 1 Frequency | Evaluator 2 Frequency | Total Frequency (%)* |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Approach | n = 37 | n = 37 | n = 74 |
| Poor | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) |
| Average | 7 | 7 | 14 (19) |
| Good | 30 | 30 | 60 (81) |
| 2. Environment | n = 37 | n = 37 | n = 74 |
| Poor | 1 | 1 | 2 (3) |
| Average | 9 | 8 | 17 (23) |
| Good | 27 | 28 | 55 (74) |
| 3. Engagement | n = 37 | n = 37 | n = 74 |
| Poor | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) |
| Average | 4 | 5 | 9 (12) |
| Good | 33 | 32 | 65 (88) |
| 4. Reaction | n = 37 | n = 37 | n = 74 |
| Poor | 1 | 1 | 2 (3) |
| Average | 6 | 7 | 13 (18) |
| Good | 30 | 29 | 59 (80) |
| 5. Reflection | n = 37 | n = 37 | n = 74 |
| Poor | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) |
| Average | 3 | 3 | 6 (8) |
| Good | 34 | 34 | 68 (92) |
| 6. Analysis | n = 37 | n = 37 | n = 74 |
| Poor | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) |
| Average | 2 | 2 | 4 (5) |
| Good | 35 | 35 | 70 (95) |
| 7. Diagnosis | n = 37 | n = 37 | n = 74 |
| Poor | 0 | 0 | 0 (0) |
| Average | 2 | 3 | 5 (7) |
| Good | 35 | 34 | 69 (93) |
| 8. Application | n = 37 | n = 37 | n = 74 |
| Poor | 1 | 1 | 2 (3) |
| Average | 3 | 2 | 5 (7) |
| Good | 33 | 34 | 67 (91) |
| Overall | n = 296 | n = 296 | n = 592 |
| Poor | 3 | 3 | 6 (1) |
| Average | 36 | 37 | 73 (12) |
| Good | 257 | 256 | 513 (87) |
*
Percentages may not equal 100% due to rounding.