Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 11;26(4):324–338. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy179

Table 2.

Summary of articles related to documentation/cost and productivity analysis (n = 48)

Subtopic Measure Medical Domain Articles Summary of Findings
Documentation time (n = 20) Mean document creation time Radiology Vorbeck et al (2000)13 5 studies11,13,18,21,23 reported decreases in mean documentation time after SR adoption, ranging from 19%13 to 92%21; 4 studies10,22,24,29 recorded increases, ranging from 13.4%22 to 50%24, and 3 studies26–28 reported no statistically significant difference
Rana et al (2005)18
Bhan et al (2008)22
Pezzullo et al (2008)24
Hawkins et al (2012)26
Hanna et al (2016)28
Segrelles et al (2017)29
Anesthesiology Alapetite et al (2008)21
Dentistry Feldman and Stevens (1990)10
Emergency department dela Cruz et al (2014)27
Pathology Klatt (1991)11
Unspecified Gonzalez Sanchez et al (2008)23
Mean dictation and/or correction time Pediatrics Borowitz (2001)14 All reported increases after SR adoption, ranging from 13.9%14 to 200%,17 although 119 reported decreases if the SR error rate was ≤ 16%
Issenman and Jaffer (2004)17
Multiple Monnich and Wetter (2000)12
Otorhinolaryngology Ilgner et al (2006)19
Pathology Al-Aynati and Chorneyko (2003)15
Hours of secretary work per minute of dictation processed Multiple Mohr et al (2003)16 Secretaries were 55.8%–87.3% less productive with SR vs conventional transcription
Total documentation time Radiology Ichikawa et al (2007)20 Decreased by 32.7–71.3% across 4 transcriptionists
Users’ perceptions of SR impact on document creation time Psychiatry Derman et al (2010)25 No perceived benefit with SR vs other methods
Turnaround time (n = 19) Mean turnaround time Radiology Rosenthal et al (1998)30 All reported decreased turnaround times, ranging from 50.3%33 to nearly 100%41
Chapman et al (2000)31
Lemme and Morin (2000)32
Ramaswamy et al (2000)33
Callaway et al (2002)34
Langer (2002)35
Langer (2002)36
Gopakumar et al (2008)37
Koivikko et al (2008)38
Hart et al (2010)39
Krishnaraj et al (2010)40
Strahan and Schneider-Kolsky (2010)41
Pathology Kang et al (2010)42
Singh and Pal (2011)43
Emergency department Zick and Olsen (2001)44
Median, 80th percentile, and/or 95th percentile turnaround time Radiology Andriole et al (2010)45 All reported decreases, ranging from 50%47 to 95.8%46 (for median turnaround times)
Prevedello et al (2014)46
Pathology Kang et al (2010)42
Sports medicine Ahlgrim et al (2016)47
Minimum turnaround time Radiology Pavlicek et al (1999)48 Decreased by 91.7%
Documentation-associated cost(n = 8) Change in cost over time Radiology Rosenthal et al (1998)30 5 studies30,33,34,50,51 overall decreases in documentation-associated costs following SR introduction; 217,24 reported increases; the remaining study49 involved the development of an econometric model for estimating the impact of SR and transcription on cost
Ramaswamy et al (2000)33
Callaway et al (2002)34
Reinus (2007)49
Pezzullo et al (2008)24
Orthopedics Corces et al (2004)50
Pathology Henricks et al (2002)51
Pediatrics Issenman and Jaffer (2004)17
Other(n = 7) Reports completed per time period Radiology Strahan and Schneider-Kolsky (2010)41 Ranged from a 41% increase52 to a 35% decrease41
Williams et al (2013)52
Report availability Radiology Hayt and Alexander (2001)53 Percentage of reports available within 12 h of dictation increased from 3% to 42%
Mean characters per minute Multiple Vogel et al (2015)54 Increased from 173 to 217 with SR vs with typing
Mean length of stay Emergency department Lo et al (2015)55 Temporarily increased by 9.3%, then settled to a new baseline of 4.3% longer
Mean report length Radiology Kauppinen et al (2013)56 433 characters and 11 character corrections per report for new SR users vs 298 and 6 character corrections characters per report for experienced users
Mean task completion time Emergency department Hodgson et al (2017)57 18.11% slower with SR vs keyboard and mouse; 16.95% slower for simple tasks, 18.40% slower for complex tasks
SR

: speech recognition.