Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 6;99(45):e23014. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000023014

Table 1.

Characteristics of the included studies.

Diagnostic Treatment Interventions Outcome

Authors County patients (T/C) criteria Duration T C measurements
Zheng et al (2018)[13] China 100/100 Rome III 4 wk EA Sham-EA 1. Effective rate
2. LDQ scores
3. NDI
Qiang et al (2018)[14] China 32/32 Rome III 30 d EA Mosapride 1. Effective rate
2. LDQ scores
3. FDDQL scores
4. Ghrelin, CGRP and GLP-1 level
Zhang et al (2015)[15] China 159/160 Rome III 4 wk EA Mosapride 1. Effective rate
2. Symptom scores
3. SF-36 scores
4. Plasma motilin level
5. EGG
6. Gastric empty
Xu et al (2015)[16] China 8/8 Rome III 30 min EA Sham-EA 1. EGG
2. HRV
3. Symptom scores
Guo et al (2011)[17] China 80/80 Rome III 6 wk EA Mosapride, 1. Symptom scores Omeprazole,
2. Effective rate Amitriptyline
3. NDSI scores
4. SF-36 scores
5. EGG
6. Plasma motilin
7. Gastric empty
Peng et al (2008)[18] China 20/20 Rome III 2 wk EA Domperidone 1. Symptom scores
2. SAS
3. SDS
4. HRV
5. EGG
6. Neuropeptide level
Liu et al(ACT) (2008)[12] China 27/27 Rome II 30 min EA Sham-EA 1. HRV
2. EGG
Liu et al(CCT) (2008)[12] China 27/27 Rome II 2 wk EA Sham-EA 1. Symptom scores
2. HRV
3. EGG
4. Neuropeptide level
5. Plasma motilin level