Skip to main content
. 2020 Nov 6;99(45):e21563. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000021563

Table 2.

Subgroup analyses on study design.

Study design (RCTs versus Cohorts) Studies Eyes OR or MD (95%CI) P I2
Postoperative UCVA of 20/20 or better 8 1397 OR 1.09 (0.62, 1.92) .763 0.0%
RCT 3 699 OR 0.61 (0.08, 4.70) .633 0.0%
Cohort 5 698 OR 1.15 (0.64, 2.06) .647 0.0%
Postoperative UCVA 7 1645 MD 0.04 (0.01, 0.07) .012 76.9%
RCT 3 595 MD 0.03 (−0.02, 0.08) .180 56.2%
Cohort 4 1050 MD 0.04 (−0.00, 0.09) .070 86.0%
Preoperative Q-value 11 1605 MD −0.00 (−0.02, 0.02) .922 68.0%
RCT 3 853 MD −0.00 (−0.02, 0.01) .668 0.0%
Cohort 8 752 MD 0.00 (−0.03, 0.03) .935 75.0%
Postoperative Q-value 11 1655 MD0.42 (0.64,0.21) .000 98.4%
RCT 3 853 MD −0.48 (−0.77, −0.18) .002 96.0%
Cohort 8 802 MD −0.41 (−0.68, −0.14) .003 98.5%
Postoperative refractive SE 6 1627 MD 0.08 (−0.09, 0.25) .336 95.4%
RCT 3 1002 MD 0.19 (−0.17, 0.54) .299 98.0%
Cohort 3 625 MD −0.00 (−0.06, 0.05) .897 0.0%
HOA 10 1309 MD0.14 (0.23,0.06) .001 98.5%
RCT 4 827 MD −0.10 (−0.17, −0.03) .006 89.4%
Cohort 6 482 MD −0.16 (−0.26, −0.05) .004 98.4%
Horizontal coma-like aberration 5 404 MD −0.00 (−0.03, 0.03) .966 0.0%
RCT 3 266 MD 0.00 (−0.04, 0.05) .816 0.0%
Cohort 2 138 MD −0.01 (−0.07, 0.05) .688 0.0%
Vertical coma-like aberration 6 455 MD −0.01 (−0.03, 0.01) .263 0.0%
RCT 3 266 MD −0.01 (−0.05, 0.03) .577 0.0%
Cohort 3 189 MD −0.01 (−0.03, 0.01) .331 0.0%
Spherical-like aberration 12 1305 MD0.19 (0.32,0.06) .004 99.2%
RCT 4 599 MD −0.24 (−0.69, 0.22) .308 99.7%
Cohort 8 706 MD −0.16 (−0.25, −0.07) .001 97.9%