Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 29;8(10):e3120. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003120

Table 2.

Pooled Complication Rates for pTRAM versus DIEP Flaps

Outcomes Studies, N pTRAM DIEP Effect Size 95% CI I2
No. Events No. Patients No. Events No. Patients
Total or partial flap loss 6 90 1562 76 1233 1.03 −0.81 to 2.88 36.62%
 Low-volume hospitals only 4 22 774 17 505 1.15 −1.08 to 3.39 60.21%
Mastectomy skin flap necrosis 3 80 680 56 409 0.36 −1.39 to 2.11 0
 Low-volume hospitals only 2 69 483 34 192 0.86 −2.30 to 4.02 0
Fat necrosis (breast) 6 342 1667 210 1291 1.43 −0.33 to 3.18 90.50%
 Low-volume hospitals only 4 147 774 76 505 1.63 −0.53 to 3.80 93.00%
Infection (breast) 5 184 1457 93 1175 1.63 −0.36 to 3.62 86.59%
 Low-volume hospitals only 4 78 774 51 505 1.39 −0.87 to 3.65 77.24%
Hematoma/seroma (breast) 5 96 1468 105 1137 0.76 −1.21 to 2.73 30.37%
 Low-volume hospitals only 4 70 785 49 467 0.84 −1.39 to 3.07 0
Wound healing complications (breast) 4 97 774 29 505 1.49 −0.78 to 3.77 80.18%
 Low-volume hospitals only 3 91 577 23 288 1.64 −1.03 to 4.31 83.62%
Abdominal bulge/hernia 5 174 1100 74 1000 2.82 0.83 to 4.80 85.70%
 Low-volume hospitals only 3 55 312 15 272 3.08 0.46 to 5.70 48.08%
Wound healing complications (donor-site) 3 129 576 106 284 0.59 −1.86 to 3.04 0
 Low-volume hospitals only 2 120 471 94 226 0.68 −2.30 to 3.66 0