Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 29;8(10):e3120. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003120

Table 4.

Summary of Patient-Reported Outcomes Findings

Direction of Finding
Outcome Study pTRAM versus DIEP fTRAM versus DIEP MS fTRAM versus DIEP Statistical Adjustment Measure
Psychosocial outcomes Chun et al., 2010 + No SF-36 energy/fatigue
SF-36 emotional well-being
Macadam et al., 2016 = = = Yes BREAST-Q psychosocial well-being
BREAST-Q sexual well-being
Erdmann-Sager et al., 2018 = = Yes BREAST-Q psychosocial well-being
BREAST-Q sexual well-being
Nelson et al., 2019 = No SF-36 mental health composite
Satisfaction Momoh et al., 2012 General satisfaction: -Aesthetic satisfaction: = No MBROS general satisfaction
MBROS aesthetic satisfaction
Yang et al., 2015 = No MBROS general satisfaction
MBROS aesthetic satisfaction
Macadam et al., 2016 Satisfaction breasts: =
Satisfaction outcome: -
= = Yes BREAST-Q satisfaction breasts
BREAST-Q satisfaction outcome
Erdmann-Sager et al., 2018 = = Yes BREAST-Q satisfaction breasts
Physical well-being Schaverien et al., 2007 = No SF-36 physical functioning
SF-36 physical role limitations
Weichman et al., 2015 = = Yes BREAST-Q PWB chest
Macadam et al., 2016 - = = Yes BREAST-Q PWB abdomen
Erdmann-Sager et al., 2018 PWB chest (one year): = PWB chest (two year):- PWB abdomen: - PWB chest: =PWB abdomen: - Yes BREAST-Q PWB chest
BREAST-Q PWB abdomen
Nelson et al., 2019 = No BREAST-Q PWB abdomen
SF-36 physical health composite
Pain Schaverien et al., 2007 = No SF-36 pain

Bold entries indicate the studies finding statistically significant differences in patient-reported outcome scores between flaps (i.e. the direction of finding is either + or -).

+ score for first reconstruction technique higher than score for second reconstruction technique.

- score for second reconstruction technique higher than score for first reconstruction technique.

= scores equivalent for both reconstruction techniques.

SF-36, short-form 36; MBROS, Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study.