Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 8;99(11):5752–5762. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.06.076

Table 7.

Effects of dietary manganese (Mn) supplementation on the tibial characteristics and ash, Ca, and P content in the tibia of duck breeders at the end of the trial (34 wk).

Variables Mn supplemental level (mg/kg)1
SEM P-value
0 20 40 80 120 160 ANOVA Linear Quadratic
Bone fresh weight (g) 5.67 5.77 5.92 5.85 5.98 5.68 0.057 0.558 0.796 0.219
Fat-free dry weight (g) 3.43 3.57 3.60 3.64 3.60 3.40 0.038 0.304 0.848 0.050
Length (mm) 94.9 94.9 95.1 95.5 97.1 95.4 0.353 0.428 0.181 0.267
Midpoint circumference (mm) 16.4 16.9 17.5 17.3 17.3 17.1 0.146 0.280 0.246 0.086
Bone mineral density (g/cm2) 0.258 0.280 0.306 0.305 0.284 0.286 0.004 0.008 0.231 0.006
Bone mineral content (g) 1.46 1.48 1.62 1.58 1.53 1.53 0.025 0.216 0.329 0.088
Breaking strength (N) 97.1 98.5 101 101 102 90.2 1.21 0.038 0.389 0.014
Ash content (%) 65.7 65.2 65.6 64.6 64.9 64.9 0.169 0.336 0.109 0.167
Ca content (%)2 23.7 23.7 23.8 23.1 23.2 23.1 0.080 0.005 <0.001 0.001
P content (%)2 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.5 10.4 10.5 0.034 0.918 0.338 0.607
Mn content (%) 15.4 15.0 17.3 18.2 18.5 18.5 0.353 0.001 <0.001 <0.001
1

Mean of 6 replicates (2 ducks per replicate) per treatment.

2

Ca: calcium; P: phosphorus.